Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Abela v. General Motors Corp.green2 sentences2019See Abela v Gen Motors Corp, 469 Mich 603, 607 ; 677 NW2d 325 (2004); Northville Pub Sch v Mich Civil Rights Comm, 118 Mich App 573, 576 ; 325 NW2d 497 (1982). 3 Further, on January 23, 2017, the day plaintiff was to begin working for defendant, plaintiff was notified by Alma Alcodray, an employee of defendant, that defendant would not be hiring -4- Plaintiff also argues that she established that there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether defendant discriminated against her on the basis of her age because defendant’s reasons for not hiring plaintiff, as stated in its motion for su 2019See Abela v Gen Motors Corp, 469 Mich 603, 607 ; 677 NW2d 325 (2004); Northville Pub Sch v Mich Civil Rights Comm, 118 Mich App 573, 576 ; 325 NW2d 497 (1982). 3 Further, on January 23, 2017, the day plaintiff was to begin working for defendant, plaintiff was notified by Alma Alcodray, an employee of defendant, that defendant would not be hiring -4- Plaintiff also argues that she established that there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether defendant discriminated against her on the basis of her age because defendant’s reasons for not hiring plaintiff, as stated in its motion for su | 1 | 1 |
Bradley v. Mid-Century Insurancegreen2 sentences1993Therefore, the repeal of the uninsured motorist statute and passage of the no-fault act largely eliminated the motivating factors underlying the Nickerson decision. 9 See Bradley v Mid-Century Ins Co, 409 Mich 1, 52-54 ; 294 NW2d 141 (1980) (Justice Levin writing for the Court), and Lankford v Citizens Ins Co, 171 Mich App 413, 420 ; 431 NW2d 59 (1988). 1993Therefore, the repeal of the uninsured motorist statute and passage of the no-fault act largely eliminated the motivating factors underlying the Nickerson decision. 9 See Bradley v Mid-Century Ins Co, 409 Mich 1, 52-54 ; 294 NW2d 141 (1980) (Justice Levin writing for the Court), and Lankford v Citizens Ins Co, 171 Mich App 413, 420 ; 431 NW2d 59 (1988). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dubey v. Stroh Brewery Co.
green
1 sentence2023Id. at 566 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Major v. Village of Newberry
green
1 sentence2023Major, 316 Mich App at 542 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Northville Public Schools v. Civil Rights Commission
green
2 sentences2019See Abela v Gen Motors Corp, 469 Mich 603, 607 ; 677 NW2d 325 (2004); Northville Pub Sch v Mich Civil Rights Comm, 118 Mich App 573, 576 ; 325 NW2d 497 (1982). 3 Further, on January 23, 2017, the day plaintiff was to begin working for defendant, plaintiff was notified by Alma Alcodray, an employee of defendant, that defendant would not be hiring -4- Plaintiff also argues that she established that there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether defendant discriminated against her on the basis of her age because defendant’s reasons for not hiring plaintiff, as stated in its motion for su 2019See Abela v Gen Motors Corp, 469 Mich 603, 607 ; 677 NW2d 325 (2004); Northville Pub Sch v Mich Civil Rights Comm, 118 Mich App 573, 576 ; 325 NW2d 497 (1982). 3 Further, on January 23, 2017, the day plaintiff was to begin working for defendant, plaintiff was notified by Alma Alcodray, an employee of defendant, that defendant would not be hiring -4- Plaintiff also argues that she established that there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether defendant discriminated against her on the basis of her age because defendant’s reasons for not hiring plaintiff, as stated in its motion for su | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Rohlman v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance
green
1 sentence2003Therefore, the repeal of the uninsured motorist statute and passage of the no-fault act largely eliminated the motivating factors underlying the Nickerson decision." Id. at 529, 502 N.W.2d 310 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Lankford v. Citizens Insurance Co. of America
green
2 sentences1993Therefore, the repeal of the uninsured motorist statute and passage of the no-fault act largely eliminated the motivating factors underlying the Nickerson decision. 9 See Bradley v Mid-Century Ins Co, 409 Mich 1, 52-54 ; 294 NW2d 141 (1980) (Justice Levin writing for the Court), and Lankford v Citizens Ins Co, 171 Mich App 413, 420 ; 431 NW2d 59 (1988). 1993Therefore, the repeal of the uninsured motorist statute and passage of the no-fault act largely eliminated the motivating factors underlying the Nickerson decision. 9 See Bradley v Mid-Century Ins Co, 409 Mich 1, 52-54 ; 294 NW2d 141 (1980) (Justice Levin writing for the Court), and Lankford v Citizens Ins Co, 171 Mich App 413, 420 ; 431 NW2d 59 (1988). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.