Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Illinois Employers Insurance v. Dragovich
green
2 sentences1998Rather, ‘it is necessary to focus on the basis for the injury and not the nomenclature of the underlying claim in order to determine whether coverage exists. . . . [S]o must the allegations be examined to determine the substance, as opposed to the mere form, of the complaint.’ ” Allstate Ins Co v Freeman, 432 Mich 656, 662-663 ; 443 NW2d 734 (1989), quoting Illinois Employers Ins of Warren v Dragovich, 139 Mich App 502, 507 ; 362 NW2d 767 (1984). 1998Rather, ‘it is necessary to focus on the basis for the injury and not the nomenclature of the underlying claim in order to determine whether coverage exists. . . . [S]o must the allegations be examined to determine the substance, as opposed to the mere form, of the complaint.’ ” Allstate Ins Co v Freeman, 432 Mich 656, 662-663 ; 443 NW2d 734 (1989), quoting Illinois Employers Ins of Warren v Dragovich, 139 Mich App 502, 507 ; 362 NW2d 767 (1984). | 3 | 1991–1998 |
Allstate Insurance v. Freeman
green
2 sentences1998Rather, ‘it is necessary to focus on the basis for the injury and not the nomenclature of the underlying claim in order to determine whether coverage exists. . . . [S]o must the allegations be examined to determine the substance, as opposed to the mere form, of the complaint.’ ” Allstate Ins Co v Freeman, 432 Mich 656, 662-663 ; 443 NW2d 734 (1989), quoting Illinois Employers Ins of Warren v Dragovich, 139 Mich App 502, 507 ; 362 NW2d 767 (1984). 1998Rather, ‘it is necessary to focus on the basis for the injury and not the nomenclature of the underlying claim in order to determine whether coverage exists. . . . [S]o must the allegations be examined to determine the substance, as opposed to the mere form, of the complaint.’ ” Allstate Ins Co v Freeman, 432 Mich 656, 662-663 ; 443 NW2d 734 (1989), quoting Illinois Employers Ins of Warren v Dragovich, 139 Mich App 502, 507 ; 362 NW2d 767 (1984). | 2 | 1998–1998 |
MICH. ED. EMP. MUT. INS. CO. v. Karr
neutral
1 sentence2006Id. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Western Casualty & Surety Group v. Coloma Township
green
2 sentences1998Relying principally on Western Casualty & Surety Group v Coloma Twp, 140 Mich App 516 ; 364 NW2d 367 (1985), sellers argue that the “occurrence” in the present case is their alleged negligent failure to reasonably inspect and make disclosures regarding the condition of the house and that, as a result, buyers experienced problems with the house as alleged in their complaint. 1998Relying principally on Western Casualty & Surety Group v Coloma Twp, 140 Mich App 516 ; 364 NW2d 367 (1985), sellers argue that the “occurrence” in the present case is their alleged negligent failure to reasonably inspect and make disclosures regarding the condition of the house and that, as a result, buyers experienced problems with the house as alleged in their complaint. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Shepard Marine Construction Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
green
2 sentences1989Rather, "it is necessary to focus on the basis for the injury and not the nomenclature of the underlying claim in order to determine whether coverage exists. . . . [S]o must the allegations be examined to determine the substance, as opposed to the mere form, of the complaint.” Illinois Employers Ins, supra at 507; Shepard Marine Construction Co v Maryland Casualty Co, 73 Mich App 62 ; 250 NW2d 541 (1976). 1989Rather, "it is necessary to focus on the basis for the injury and not the nomenclature of the underlying claim in order to determine whether coverage exists. . . . [S]o must the allegations be examined to determine the substance, as opposed to the mere form, of the complaint.” Illinois Employers Ins, supra at 507; Shepard Marine Construction Co v Maryland Casualty Co, 73 Mich App 62 ; 250 NW2d 541 (1976). | 1 | 1989–1989 |