Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 1977–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Wujkowski
green
1 sentence2008Under these circumstances, the Circuit Court erred in ruling that the violation of the administrative rule required suppression of the results of the Breathalyzer test.” Id. at 186 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
People v. Willis
green
2 sentences1998In People v Willis, 180 Mich App 31, 35-36 ; 446 NW2d 562 (1989), this Court held that where the administrative rules regarding the administration of Breathalyzer tests have not been complied with, the accuracy of those results is sufficiently questionable so as to preclude the test results from being admitted into evidence. 1998In People v Willis, 180 Mich App 31, 35-36 ; 446 NW2d 562 (1989), this Court held that where the administrative rules regarding the administration of Breathalyzer tests have not been complied with, the accuracy of those results is sufficiently questionable so as to preclude the test results from being admitted into evidence. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
People v. Kozar
green
2 sentences1994In addition, this Court in Kozar, supra at 509 , stated that a defendant may introduce into evidence expert witness evidence interpreting the results of the Breathalyzer test as it relates to the time of the arrest. 1994In addition, this Court in Kozar, supra at 509 , stated that a defendant may introduce into evidence expert witness evidence interpreting the results of the Breathalyzer test as it relates to the time of the arrest. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
McNitt v. Citco Drilling Co.
green
2 sentences1979Plaintiffs next cite McNitt v Citco Drilling Co, 397 Mich 384 ; 245 NW2d 18 (1976), and argue that the trial court erred in admitting over objection the results of the Breathalyzer test administered to defendant Dortman pursuant to the implied consent statute. 1979Plaintiffs next cite McNitt v Citco Drilling Co, 397 Mich 384 ; 245 NW2d 18 (1976), and argue that the trial court erred in admitting over objection the results of the Breathalyzer test administered to defendant Dortman pursuant to the implied consent statute. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Edwards v. State
green
1 sentence1977To adopt this line of reasoning would have the desired effect of exposing to continuous question any mechanical device or scientific method used by law enforcement officials in the performance of their duties.” 544 P2d at 62 . | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.