Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
43 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1970–2026 12 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Maiden v. Rozwoodgreen2 sentences2024A reviewing court may not employ a standard citing the mere possibility that the claim might be supported by evidence produced at trial.” Id. at 121 . 2024See Youmans, 336 Mich App at 231 (“Because plaintiff did not carry her burden of demonstrating disproportionality, it necessarily follows that the second Bolt factor militates in favor of the Township’s position.”); see also Maiden, 461 Mich at 121 (holding that, in the context of a (C)(10) motion, “[a] reviewing court may not employ a standard citing the mere possibility that the claim might be supported by evidence produced at trial”). | 3 | 27 |
the Meisner Law Group v. Weston Downs Condominium Associationgreen1 sentence2025Meisner, 321 Mich App at 723 (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Jamila Youmans v. Charter Township of Bloomfieldgreen1 sentence2024See Youmans, 336 Mich App at 231 (“Because plaintiff did not carry her burden of demonstrating disproportionality, it necessarily follows that the second Bolt factor militates in favor of the Township’s position.”); see also Maiden, 461 Mich at 121 (holding that, in the context of a (C)(10) motion, “[a] reviewing court may not employ a standard citing the mere possibility that the claim might be supported by evidence produced at trial”). | 1 | 1 |
Cloverleaf Car Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.green2 sentences2002A mere promise is insufficient under our court rules. [Maiden, supra at 121 .] See also Smith, supra; Cloverleaf Car Co v Phillips Petroleum Co, 213 Mich App 186, 192-193 ; 540 NW2d 297 (1995) (“A party opposing a motion for summary disposition must present more than conjecture and speculation to meet its burden of providing evidentiary proof establishing a genuine issue of material fact.”). 2002A mere promise is insufficient under our court rules. [Maiden, supra at 121 .] See also Smith, supra; Cloverleaf Car Co v Phillips Petroleum Co, 213 Mich App 186, 192-193 ; 540 NW2d 297 (1995) (“A party opposing a motion for summary disposition must present more than conjecture and speculation to meet its burden of providing evidentiary proof establishing a genuine issue of material fact.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bennett v. Detroit Police Chief
green
2 sentences2023Bennett v Detroit Police Chief, 274 Mich App 307, 317 ; 732 NW2d 164 (2006). 2023Bennett v Detroit Police Chief, 274 Mich App 307, 317 ; 732 NW2d 164 (2006). | 14 | 2015–2023 |
People v. Carines
green
1 sentence2025A mere promise is insufficient under our court rules.” Id. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
John Pugno v. Blue Harvest Farms LLC
green
2 sentences2023A mere promise is insufficient under our court rules. [Maiden, 461 Mich at 121 .] “This Court’s task is to review the record evidence, and all reasonable inferences drawn from it, and decide whether a genuine issue regarding any material fact exists to warrant a trial.” Pugno v Blue Harvest Farms LLC, 326 Mich App 1, 11-12 ; 930 NW2d 393 (2018) (quotation marks and citation omitted). 2023A mere promise is insufficient under our court rules. [Maiden, 461 Mich at 121 .] “This Court’s task is to review the record evidence, and all reasonable inferences drawn from it, and decide whether a genuine issue regarding any material fact exists to warrant a trial.” Pugno v Blue Harvest Farms LLC, 326 Mich App 1, 11-12 ; 930 NW2d 393 (2018) (quotation marks and citation omitted). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Law Offices of Jeffrey Sherbow, PC v. Fieger & Fieger, PC
green
2 sentences2020A mere promise is insufficient under our court rules.” Law Offices of Jeffrey Sherbow, PC v Fieger & Fieger, PC, 326 Mich App 684, 694 ; 930 NW2d 416 (2019) (quotation marks omitted). 2020A mere promise is insufficient under our court rules.” Law Offices of Jeffrey Sherbow, PC v Fieger & Fieger, PC, 326 Mich App 684, 694 ; 930 NW2d 416 (2019) (quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Skinner v. Square D Co.
red
2 sentences2019A mere possibility that the claim might be supported by evidence at trial is insufficient, Maiden v Rozwood, 461 Mich 109, 121 ; 597 NW2d 817 (1999), as are speculation and conjecture, Skinner v Square D Co, 445 Mich 153, 172-173 ; 516 NW2d 475 (1994). 2019A mere possibility that the claim might be supported by evidence at trial is insufficient, Maiden v Rozwood, 461 Mich 109, 121 ; 597 NW2d 817 (1999), as are speculation and conjecture, Skinner v Square D Co, 445 Mich 153, 172-173 ; 516 NW2d 475 (1994). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Smith v. Globe Life Insurance
green
1 sentence2002A mere promise is insufficient under our court rules. [Maiden, supra at 121 .] See also Smith, supra; Cloverleaf Car Co v Phillips Petroleum Co, 213 Mich App 186, 192-193 ; 540 NW2d 297 (1995) (“A party opposing a motion for summary disposition must present more than conjecture and speculation to meet its burden of providing evidentiary proof establishing a genuine issue of material fact.”). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Kennedy v. City of Newark
green
1 sentence1970Kennedy v. City of Newark (1959), 29 NJ 178 ( 148 A2d 473 ).” (e) Does Rule VII Violate the Provisions of Section 2, Article 1 of the 1963 Michigan Constitution which Prohibits the Denial of the Enjoyment of Civil or Political Rights? | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.