stand defense (Michigan) · Go Syfert
← Michigan issues

stand defense in Michigan

5 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1959–1982 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Balog green
michctapp · 1974
2 sentences

1982People v Balog, 56 Mich App 624 ; 224 NW2d 725 (1974), MCL 600.2159; MSA 27A.2159.

1982People v Balog, 56 Mich App 624 ; 224 NW2d 725 (1974), MCL 600.2159; MSA 27A.2159.

11982–1982
People v. Embry green
michctapp · 1976
2 sentences

1978People v Embry, 68 Mich App 667, 670 ; 243 NW2d 711 (1976).

1978People v Embry, 68 Mich App 667, 670 ; 243 NW2d 711 (1976).

11978–1978
Griffin v. California green
scotus · 1965
2 sentences

1977Griffin v California, 380 US 609 ; 85 S Ct 1229 ; 14 L Ed 2d 106 (1965). 9 We think this argument lacks merit.

1977Griffin v California, 380 US 609 ; 85 S Ct 1229 ; 14 L Ed 2d 106 (1965). 9 We think this argument lacks merit.

11977–1977
Escobedo v. Illinois green
scotus · 1964
2 sentences

1969The Federal cases of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), 384 US 436 ( 86 S Ct 1602 , 16 L Ed 2d 694 , 10 ALR3d 974), and Escobedo v. Illinois (1964), 378 US 478 ( 84 S Ct 1758, 12 .

1969The Federal cases of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), 384 US 436 ( 86 S Ct 1602 , 16 L Ed 2d 694 , 10 ALR3d 974), and Escobedo v. Illinois (1964), 378 US 478 ( 84 S Ct 1758, 12 .

11969–1969
Miranda v. Arizona green
scotus · 1966
2 sentences

1969The Federal cases of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), 384 US 436 ( 86 S Ct 1602 , 16 L Ed 2d 694 , 10 ALR3d 974), and Escobedo v. Illinois (1964), 378 US 478 ( 84 S Ct 1758, 12 .

1969The Federal cases of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), 384 US 436 ( 86 S Ct 1602 , 16 L Ed 2d 694 , 10 ALR3d 974), and Escobedo v. Illinois (1964), 378 US 478 ( 84 S Ct 1758, 12 .

11969–1969
United States v. Shibley green
casd · 1953
1 sentence

1959But, as was held in United States v. Shibley, 112 F Supp 734 , 748: “Repeated rulings-against a litigant, no matter how erroneous, and how vigorously and consistently expressed, are not disqualifying.” Every court, and every member of every appellate court, 'must form an opinion as to the merits of the matter before him, often, as to the bona fides of the parties.

11959–1959

Where else courts name it

CA 21 (1941–2026) TX 21 (1967–2019) PA 12 (1936–2026) GA 9 (1975–2026) NY 9 (1968–2024) LA 7 (1976–2010) OH 6 (1949–2023) MS 6 (1992–2006) IL 5 (1977–2021) MN 5 (1938–2023) OR 5 (1940–2025) AZ 5 (1967–1976) MI 5 (1959–1982) TN 5 (1979–2010) MT 5 (1927–2018) MA 5 (1971–2025) CO 4 (1946–2010) MD 4 (1978–2019) DC 4 (1974–2011) AR 3 (1976–2017) SC 3 (2012–2021) NJ 3 (1970–1988) WA 3 (2014–2015) KS 3 (1970–2021) NH 2 (1970–1987) FL 2 (1989–2018) WI 2 (1883–2020) IA 2 (1924–2015) AL 2 (1973–1985) MO 2 (1957–2014) GU 2 (2021–2022) RI 2 (1971–2001) NV 2 (1965–1984) HI 2 (1920–2017) UT 2 (2003–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check