witness cannot put error in Michigan

1973In this case he applied it on the instant, so far as ruling out the improper statement could do so; and no doubt he would have given specific caution to the jury if requested.’ People v Mead, 50 Mich 228 [1883].” See also People v Podsiad, 295 Mich 541 (1940).

1931“A witness cannot put error into a case by an unauthorized remark, neither called out by a question nor sanctioned by the judge; and if what'he does or says improperly is likely to do much mischief, it is presumed the judge will apply the proper corrective in his instructions if requested to do so.” People v. Mead, 50 Mich. 228 .

1973Hill v Robinson, 23 Mich 24 [1871]; People v Wilson, 133 Mich 517 [1903]. " 'When a witness for any reason gives an irresponsive answer and which is not competent evidence, and the answer is suppressed at once, the case must be a very peculiar and very strong one which would justify a reversal for such fault or mistake of the witness.’ Hill v Robinson, supra. *487 "'A witness cannot put error into a case by an unauthorized remark, neither called out by a question nor sanctioned by the judge; and if what he does or says improperly is likely to do much mischief, it is presumed the judge will app

1973Hill v Robinson, 23 Mich 24 [1871]; People v Wilson, 133 Mich 517 [1903]. " 'When a witness for any reason gives an irresponsive answer and which is not competent evidence, and the answer is suppressed at once, the case must be a very peculiar and very strong one which would justify a reversal for such fault or mistake of the witness.’ Hill v Robinson, supra. *487 "'A witness cannot put error into a case by an unauthorized remark, neither called out by a question nor sanctioned by the judge; and if what he does or says improperly is likely to do much mischief, it is presumed the judge will app

1973Improper testimony offered by a witness and promptly struck out by the court on objection is not reversible error. * * * A witness cannot put error into a case by an unauthorized remark, neither called out by a question nor sanctioned by the judge; and if what he says or does improperly is likely to do much mischief, it is presumed that the judge will apply the proper corrective measures in his instructions if requested to do so.” See also People v Joseph Barbara Jr, 23 Mich App 540 (1970); People v Gibson, 25 Mich App 622 (1970); People v Fusion Thomas, 36 Mich App 23 (1971); People v Podsiad

1973In this case he applied it on the instant, so far as ruling out the improper statement could do so; and no doubt he would have given specific caution to the jury if requested.’ People v Mead, 50 Mich 228 [1883].” See also People v Podsiad, 295 Mich 541 (1940).

1973Improper testimony offered by a witness and promptly struck out by the court on objection is not reversible error. * * * A witness cannot put error into a case by an unauthorized remark, neither called out by a question nor sanctioned by the judge; and if what he says or does improperly is likely to do much mischief, it is presumed that the judge will apply the proper corrective measures in his instructions if requested to do so.” See also People v Joseph Barbara Jr, 23 Mich App 540 (1970); People v Gibson, 25 Mich App 622 (1970); People v Fusion Thomas, 36 Mich App 23 (1971); People v Podsiad

1973Hill v Robinson, 23 Mich 24 [1871]; People v Wilson, 133 Mich 517 [1903]. " 'When a witness for any reason gives an irresponsive answer and which is not competent evidence, and the answer is suppressed at once, the case must be a very peculiar and very strong one which would justify a reversal for such fault or mistake of the witness.’ Hill v Robinson, supra. *487 "'A witness cannot put error into a case by an unauthorized remark, neither called out by a question nor sanctioned by the judge; and if what he does or says improperly is likely to do much mischief, it is presumed the judge will app

1973Improper testimony offered by a witness and promptly struck out by the court on objection is not reversible error. * * * A witness cannot put error into a case by an unauthorized remark, neither called out by a question nor sanctioned by the judge; and if what he says or does improperly is likely to do much mischief, it is presumed that the judge will apply the proper corrective measures in his instructions if requested to do so.” See also People v Joseph Barbara Jr, 23 Mich App 540 (1970); People v Gibson, 25 Mich App 622 (1970); People v Fusion Thomas, 36 Mich App 23 (1971); People v Podsiad

1973Improper testimony offered by a witness and promptly struck out by the court on objection is not reversible error. * * * A witness cannot put error into a case by an unauthorized remark, neither called out by a question nor sanctioned by the judge; and if what he says or does improperly is likely to do much mischief, it is presumed that the judge will apply the proper corrective measures in his instructions if requested to do so.” See also People v Joseph Barbara Jr, 23 Mich App 540 (1970); People v Gibson, 25 Mich App 622 (1970); People v Fusion Thomas, 36 Mich App 23 (1971); People v Podsiad

1970People v. Droste (1910), 160 Mich 66 . *546 Unresponsive answers, irrelevant in nature alone, are not sufficient to cause reversible error.