5 Minnesota opinions name it 1 courts 1985–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Morrissey v. Brewergreen1 sentence2016See id. | 1 | 1 |
Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroadgreen2 sentences2014See Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown R.R., 842 U.S. 359 , 368, 72 S.Ct. 312, 315 , 96 L.Ed. 398 (1952). 2014See Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown R.R., 842 U.S. 359 , 368, 72 S.Ct. 312, 315 , 96 L.Ed. 398 (1952). | 1 | 1 |
Pinkney v. Independent School District No. 691green1 sentence1986Pinkney v. Independent School District No. 691, 366 N.W.2d 362, 365 (Minn.Ct.App.1985). | 1 | 1 |
Crosby-Ironton Federation of Teachers, Local 1325 v. Independent School District No. 182green1 sentence1985See Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, 349 N.W.2d 563, 567-68 (Minn.Ct.App.1984); cf. Crosby-Ironton Federation of Teachers v. Independent School District No. 182, 285 N.W.2d 667, 670 (Minn.1979) (arbitration matter—“due process may be lacking if some applicable code of responsibility is not followed”). | 1 | 1 |
Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, Aitkingreen1 sentence1985See Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, 349 N.W.2d 563, 567-68 (Minn.Ct.App.1984); cf. Crosby-Ironton Federation of Teachers v. Independent School District No. 182, 285 N.W.2d 667, 670 (Minn.1979) (arbitration matter—“due process may be lacking if some applicable code of responsibility is not followed”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Odenthal v. Minnesota Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists
green
1 sentence2003Consequently, the district court has subject-matter jurisdiction to address this claim. “[T]he state constitution protects the right to free exercise of religion and prohibits the establishment of religion * * ⅝.” Id. at 442 (citing Minn. Const, art. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.