neutral hearing (North Carolina) · Go Syfert
← North Carolina issues

neutral hearing in North Carolina

7 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2010–2022 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Black v. Romanogreen
scotus · 1985 · cited in 5 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2017–2022
2 sentences

2022Black v. Romano, 471 U.S. 606, 612 , 105 S.Ct. 2254, 2258 (1985) (citing Gagnon, 411 U.S. at 786 , 93 S.Ct. at 1761 ). ¶ 15 Further, N.C.G.S. § 15A-1345(e) provides that: Before revoking or extending probation, the court must, unless the probationer waives the hearing, hold a hearing to determine whether to revoke or extend probation and must make findings to support the decision and a summary record of the proceedings.

2022Black v. Romano, 471 U.S. 606, 612 , 105 S.Ct. 2254, 2258 (1985) (citing Gagnon, 411 U.S. at 786 , 93 S.Ct. at 1761 ). ¶ 15 Further, N.C.G.S. § 15A-1345(e) provides that: Before revoking or extending probation, the court must, unless the probationer waives the hearing, hold a hearing to determine whether to revoke or extend probation and must make findings to support the decision and a summary record of the proceedings.

55

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Gagnon v. Scarpelli red
scotus · 1973
2 sentences

2022Black v. Romano, 471 U.S. 606, 612 , 105 S.Ct. 2254, 2258 (1985) (citing Gagnon, 411 U.S. at 786 , 93 S.Ct. at 1761 ). ¶ 15 Further, N.C.G.S. § 15A-1345(e) provides that: Before revoking or extending probation, the court must, unless the probationer waives the hearing, hold a hearing to determine whether to revoke or extend probation and must make findings to support the decision and a summary record of the proceedings.

2022Black v. Romano, 471 U.S. 606, 612 , 105 S.Ct. 2254, 2258 (1985) (citing Gagnon, 411 U.S. at 786 , 93 S.Ct. at 1761 ). ¶ 15 Further, N.C.G.S. § 15A-1345(e) provides that: Before revoking or extending probation, the court must, unless the probationer waives the hearing, hold a hearing to determine whether to revoke or extend probation and must make findings to support the decision and a summary record of the proceedings.

52017–2022
Konkle v. Henson green
indctapp · 1996
1 sentence

2015Therefore, based on the allegations in the complaint, we do not foresee 'excessive' entanglement in internal church matters or in interpretation of religious doctrine or ecclesiastical law."); Konkle v. Henson, 672 N.E.2d 450 , 456 (Ind.Ct.App.1996) (concluding that First Amendment did not bar plaintiff's negligent supervision claim because review of that claim "only requires the court to determine if the Church Defendants knew of [minister's] inappropriate conduct yet failed to protect third parties from him.

12015–2015
Alexander v. Cumberland County Board of Education green
ncctapp · 2005
1 sentence

2010Id.

12010–2010

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1345 (5) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1343 (3) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1344 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 57 (1985–2026) CA 39 (1967–2026) CT 16 (1972–2023) IL 14 (1968–2013) NY 14 (1981–2026) IN 14 (1970–2020) DC 9 (1986–2015) WA 7 (2009–2022) PA 7 (1974–2023) NC 7 (2010–2022) GA 7 (2011–2025) DE 6 (1963–2024) CO 6 (1979–2006) MA 5 (1978–2018) OR 5 (1993–2019) OH 5 (1991–2025) FL 5 (1983–2002) WV 5 (1981–1994) MN 5 (1985–2016) ID 5 (1987–2026) KS 4 (1994–2021) ND 4 (1990–2025) NM 3 (1979–2021) MT 3 (1987–2016) MD 3 (1992–2021) HI 2 (2004–2012) MO 2 (2011–2012) IA 2 (2018–2018) MI 2 (1983–2017) LA 2 (1995–1999) ME 2 (1975–1990)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check