Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1927–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rooney v. Rooneygreen1 sentence2016The “point of a neutral principles test is to apply a purely secular perspective to a dispute, without inquiring into religious doctrine of practice.” Rooney v. Rooney, 669 N.W.2d 362, 368 (Minn. App. 2003) (citing Jones, 443 U.S. at 604 , 99 S. Ct. at 3026 ), review denied (Minn. Nov. 25, 2003). | 1 | 1 |
Crawford v. Washingtongreen2 sentences2005The singular root of the clause, the Court observed, was the right of cross-examination, id. at 1360-61, a practice rule which has been and remains one of “vital importance” as a result of abusive use of pretrial statements. 2005The singular root of the clause, the Court observed, was the right of cross-examination, id. at 1360-61, a practice rule which has been and remains one of "vital importance" as a result of abusive use of pretrial statements. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Congergreen1 sentence2003See id. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jones v. Wolf
green
1 sentence2016The “point of a neutral principles test is to apply a purely secular perspective to a dispute, without inquiring into religious doctrine of practice.” Rooney v. Rooney, 669 N.W.2d 362, 368 (Minn. App. 2003) (citing Jones, 443 U.S. at 604 , 99 S. Ct. at 3026 ), review denied (Minn. Nov. 25, 2003). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Feltmann v. Feltmann
green
2 sentences1970Feltmann v. Feltmann, 187 Minn. 591 , 246 N. W. 360 . 1970Feltmann v. Feltmann, 187 Minn. 591 , 246 N. W. 360 . | 1 | 1970–1970 |
State v. Greenman
neutral
1 sentence1927As was said in State v. Greenman, 23 Minn. 209 , “The law is watchful, and properly so, of the manner in which jurors are selected,” and, if the manner of selection is in disregard of the statute, those whose interests are directly affected should have a remedy. '''We hold that mandamus is not the proper remedy here, because persons whose interests may be affected by the action of the grand or petit juries of Renville county during the year 1927 have “a *182 plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law by interposing a challenge to the panel, and need not invoke the aid of | 1 | 1927–1927 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.