Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1910–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bland Farms, LLC v. Georgia Department of Agriculturegreen2 sentences2013Bland Farms v. Ga. Dept. of Agriculture, 281 Ga. 192, 194 ( 637 SE2d 37 ) (2006). 2013Bland Farms v. Ga. Dept. of Agriculture, 281 Ga. 192, 194 ( 637 SE2d 37 ) (2006). | 2 | 2 |
Maxwell v. Bishopgreen2 sentences1970See Maxwell v. Bishop, 385 U. S. 650 (87 SC 768, 17 LE2d 671). 1970See Maxwell v. Bishop, 385 U. S. 650 (87 SC 768, 17 LE2d 671).” Cummings v. State, 226 Ga. 46, 51 , supra. Although the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the Maxwell case to consider, inter alia, the single-verdict procedure ( 393 U. S. 997 ), that case has been remanded to the District Court to consider a belatedly-raised Witherspoon issue. 38 U. S. L. | 2 | 2 |
Brand v. Brandgreen2 sentences1997See Brand v. Brand, 244 Ga. 124 ( 259 SE2d 133 ) (1979) (“A rule nisi may be used by the trial court to give notice of a permanent child custody hearing notwithstanding the practice that a rule nisi is more often used to give notice of preliminary, temporary or other interlocutory hearings”). 1997See Brand v. Brand, 244 Ga. 124 ( 259 SE2d 133 ) (1979) (“A rule nisi may be used by the trial court to give notice of a permanent child custody hearing notwithstanding the practice that a rule nisi is more often used to give notice of preliminary, temporary or other interlocutory hearings”). | 1 | 1 |
Holcomb v. Stategreen2 sentences1982Thomas v. State, 90 Ga. 437 ( 16 SE 94 ) (1892); Holcomb v. State, 130 Ga. App. 154, 157 (4) ( 202 SE2d 529 ) (1973); White v. State, 137 Ga. App. 9 (1) ( 223 SE2d 24 ) (1975). 1982Thomas v. State, 90 Ga. 437 ( 16 SE 94 ) (1892); Holcomb v. State, 130 Ga. App. 154, 157 (4) ( 202 SE2d 529 ) (1973); White v. State, 137 Ga. App. 9 (1) ( 223 SE2d 24 ) (1975). | 1 | 1 |
Cummings v. Stategreen1 sentence1970See Maxwell v. Bishop, 385 U. S. 650 (87 SC 768, 17 LE2d 671).” Cummings v. State, 226 Ga. 46, 51 , supra. Although the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the Maxwell case to consider, inter alia, the single-verdict procedure ( 393 U. S. 997 ), that case has been remanded to the District Court to consider a belatedly-raised Witherspoon issue. 38 U. S. L. | 1 | 1 |
National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.green1 sentence1970See Maxwell v. Bishop, 385 U. S. 650 (87 SC 768, 17 LE2d 671).” Cummings v. State, 226 Ga. 46, 51 , supra. Although the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the Maxwell case to consider, inter alia, the single-verdict procedure ( 393 U. S. 997 ), that case has been remanded to the District Court to consider a belatedly-raised Witherspoon issue. 38 U. S. L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
National Furniture Co. v. Edwards
neutral
2 sentences1912In National Furniture Co. v. Edwards, 105 Ga. 240 ( 31 S. E. 161 ), it is held that “the proper practice in a claim case, where the claimant fails to put in an appearance, would be either to dismiss the claim, or for the plaintiff to make out his case before he would be entitled to a verdict or judgment subjecting the property.” Under this decision, when the case was called for trial and the claimant was absent and unrepresented, the trial judge could either have granted a motion to dismiss the claim, or' have allowed the plaintiff to make out his case and take a verdict finding the property s 1912In National Furniture Co. v. Edwards, 105 Ga. 240 ( 31 S. E. 161 ), it is held that “the proper practice in a claim case, where the claimant fails to put in an appearance, would be either to dismiss the claim, or for the plaintiff to make out his case before he would be entitled to a verdict or judgment subjecting the property.” Under this decision, when the case was called for trial and the claimant was absent and unrepresented, the trial judge could either have granted a motion to dismiss the claim, or' have allowed the plaintiff to make out his case and take a verdict finding the property s | 2 | 1912–1927 |
Thomas v. State
green
2 sentences1982Thomas v. State, 90 Ga. 437 ( 16 SE 94 ) (1892); Holcomb v. State, 130 Ga. App. 154, 157 (4) ( 202 SE2d 529 ) (1973); White v. State, 137 Ga. App. 9 (1) ( 223 SE2d 24 ) (1975). 1982Thomas v. State, 90 Ga. 437 ( 16 SE 94 ) (1892); Holcomb v. State, 130 Ga. App. 154, 157 (4) ( 202 SE2d 529 ) (1973); White v. State, 137 Ga. App. 9 (1) ( 223 SE2d 24 ) (1975). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
White v. State
green
2 sentences1982Thomas v. State, 90 Ga. 437 ( 16 SE 94 ) (1892); Holcomb v. State, 130 Ga. App. 154, 157 (4) ( 202 SE2d 529 ) (1973); White v. State, 137 Ga. App. 9 (1) ( 223 SE2d 24 ) (1975). 1982Thomas v. State, 90 Ga. 437 ( 16 SE 94 ) (1892); Holcomb v. State, 130 Ga. App. 154, 157 (4) ( 202 SE2d 529 ) (1973); White v. State, 137 Ga. App. 9 (1) ( 223 SE2d 24 ) (1975). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Blount v. State
green
2 sentences1959While the State offered in rebuttal the affidavits of all of the jurors that no improper communication or conduct was had by or with them at any time while they were engaged in the trial of the case, an examination of the record on file in this court in Blount v. State, 214 Ga. 433 (4) ( 105 S. E. 2d 304 ), discloses that a like showing was made in that case with respect to a similar ground, and this court there held: “With reference to ground 14, complaining because the bailiff left the jury and went to bed in a separate room, we find that this practice was error. 1959While the State offered in rebuttal the affidavits of all of the jurors that no improper communication or conduct was had by or with them at any time while they were engaged in the trial of the case, an examination of the record on file in this court in Blount v. State, 214 Ga. 433 (4) ( 105 S. E. 2d 304 ), discloses that a like showing was made in that case with respect to a similar ground, and this court there held: “With reference to ground 14, complaining because the bailiff left the jury and went to bed in a separate room, we find that this practice was error. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Bank of Southwestern Georgia v. Empire Life Insurance
green
2 sentences1927National Furniture Co. v. Edwards, 105 Ga. 240 ( 31 S. E. 161 ) ; Bank of Southwestern Georgia v. Empire Life Insurance Co., 10 Ga. App. 320 ( 73 S. E. 597 ). 6. 1927National Furniture Co. v. Edwards, 105 Ga. 240 ( 31 S. E. 161 ) ; Bank of Southwestern Georgia v. Empire Life Insurance Co., 10 Ga. App. 320 ( 73 S. E. 597 ). 6. | 1 | 1927–1927 |
Cawthon v. State
green
1 sentence1910Where, as in this case, the objection makes a direct question of the admissibility or inadmissibility of the testimony, and there is no question connecting it with other testimony or the like, the better practice is to rule directly on the question and not to admit it “for the present.” This case differs from Cawthon v. State, 119 Ga. 396 ( 46 S. E. 897 ), where the testimony objected to was to be connected with the testimony of another witness to be examined. 4. | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.