Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Reinersgreen2 sentences2015State v. Reiners, 664 N.W.2d 826, 832 (Minn.2003). 2015State v. Reiners, 664 N.W.2d 826, 832 (Minn. 2003). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Martingreen1 sentence2015See id.; State v. Martin, 614 N.W.2d 214, 222 (Minn.2000) (holding that a close family member’s involvement with the legal system is a legitimate race-neutral reason for the state to exercise a preemptory challenge). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Reinersgreen2 sentences2003See Reiners, 644 N.W.2d at 126-27 . 2003See Reiners, 644 N.W.2d at 126-27 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Terry v. Ohio
green
2 sentences2018I also agree that the court of appeals erred when it held that the exception to the warrant requirement announced in Terry v. Ohio , 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), applies when an officer has a reasonable suspicion that a person "might" commit a crime. 2018I also agree that the court of appeals erred when it held that the exception to the warrant requirement announced in Terry v. Ohio , 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), applies when an officer has a reasonable suspicion that a person "might" commit a crime. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
United States v. Martinez-Salazar
green
2 sentences2016The Supreme Court disagreed, reasoning that loss of a preemptory challenge, without more, does not implicate the Sixth Amendment and Martinez-Salazar used his peremptory challenge in accord with, a primary purpose of such challenges—“to help secure the constitutional guarantee of trial by an impartial jury.” Id. at 315-16 , 120 S.Ct. at 781-82 . 2016The Supreme Court disagreed, reasoning that loss of a preemptory challenge, without more, does not implicate the Sixth Amendment and Martinez-Salazar used his peremptory challenge in accord with, a primary purpose of such challenges—“to help secure the constitutional guarantee of trial by an impartial jury.” Id. at 315-16 , 120 S.Ct. at 781-82 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.