Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1913–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Nixon v. Williamsongreen2 sentences1998Nixon v. Williamson, 741 S.W.2d 745, 746 [2] (Mo.App.1988). 1988Nixon, 741 S.W.2d at 746 [1]. | 2 | 2 |
Hostler v. Green Park Development Co.green1 sentence2011“The essence of an action for trespass is violation of possession.” 2 Hostler v. Green Park Development Co., 986 S.W.2d 500, 506 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
Meeker v. Grissumgreen1 sentence1999Meeker v. Grissum, 970 S.W.2d 345, 347 (Mo.App.1998). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Barbarick v. Anderson
neutral
1 sentence1913In support of this position counsel cite, among other cases, Barbarick v. Anderson, 45 Mo. App. 270 , and Levy v. McClintock, 141 Mo. App. 593 , 125 S. W. 546 . | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Levy v. McClintock
neutral
2 sentences1913In support of this position counsel cite, among other cases, Barbarick v. Anderson, 45 Mo. App. 270 , and Levy v. McClintock, 141 Mo. App. 593 , 125 S. W. 546 . 1913In support of this position counsel cite, among other cases, Barbarick v. Anderson, 45 Mo. App. 270 , and Levy v. McClintock, 141 Mo. App. 593 , 125 S. W. 546 . | 1 | 1913–1913 |