Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1979–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Marriage of Johnsongreen1 sentence2005In re Marriage of Johnson, 856 S.W.2d 921, 924 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
Moseley v. Moseleygreen1 sentence2002Moseley v. Moseley, 795 S.W.2d 464, 467 (Mo.App.1990). | 1 | 1 |
Rasmussen v. Rasmussengreen1 sentence1990Rasmussen v. Rasmussen, 627 S.W.2d 117, 118 (Mo.App.1982). | 1 | 1 |
Hull v. Hullgreen1 sentence1982Interpretation given the provisions of § 452.330 has led to the rule that all property “which either or both spouses acquire during the marriage is marital property regardless of the record title unless the acquisition be by circumstances particularly qualified as exceptions ...” and “The burden of proving the exception falls on the party attacking the statutory presumption.” Hull v. Hull, 591 S.W.2d 376, 379 (Mo.App.1979). | 1 | 1 |
C. B. H. v. R. N. H.green1 sentence1979C.B.H. v. R.N.H., 571 S.W.2d 449, 456 (Mo.App.1978). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||