railroad rule (Missouri) · Go Syfert
← Missouri issues

railroad rule in Missouri

5 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1917–2024 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Hemeyer v. Wilsongreen
moctapp · 2001 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024“The trial court has broad discretion in determining whether to admit deposition testimony” and “[an appellate] court will not disturb the [trial] court’s decision to exclude deposition testimony absent an abuse of that discretion.” Hemeyer v. Wilson, 59 S.W.3d 574, 580 (Mo. App. W.D. 2001).

11
State ex rel. Koster v. Caingreen
moctapp · 2012 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024See Cain, 383 S.W.3d at 116 . b.

11
Howes v. Howesgreen
moctapp · 2016 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
2 sentences

2024SKMDV Holdings, Inc. v. Green Jacobson, P.C., 494 S.W.3d 537, 560 (Mo. App. E.D. 2016). 37 Unless otherwise indicated, all references to section 408.040 are to RSMo 2016 (effective from January 15, 2015, to the present). 42 Section 408.040 provides for post-judgment interest and its purpose is “to compensate a judgment creditor for the judgment debtor’s delay in satisfying the judgment pending the judgment debtor’s appeal.” SKMDV Holdings, 494 S.W.3d at 561 (discussing a former, substantively similar version of the statute and quoting Moore ex rel.

2024SKMDV Holdings, Inc. v. Green Jacobson, P.C., 494 S.W.3d 537, 560 (Mo. App. E.D. 2016). 37 Unless otherwise indicated, all references to section 408.040 are to RSMo 2016 (effective from January 15, 2015, to the present). 42 Section 408.040 provides for post-judgment interest and its purpose is “to compensate a judgment creditor for the judgment debtor’s delay in satisfying the judgment pending the judgment debtor’s appeal.” SKMDV Holdings, 494 S.W.3d at 561 (discussing a former, substantively similar version of the statute and quoting Moore ex rel.

11
Heifetz v. Apex Clayton, Inc.green
· 2018 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024See id.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Woods green
moctapp · 2011
1 sentence

2024See id.; see also Rosales, 597 S.W.3d at 685-86; Alberswerth, 184 S.W.3d at 100 ; cf. State v. Woods, 336 S.W.3d 473, 474-75 , 474 n.1, 475 n.2 (Mo. App. E.D. 2011) (holding a party preserved a claim relating to the admission of video deposition testimony for appeal when the party raised an objection pre-trial and objected to its admission at trial).

12024–2024
Davolt v. Highland green
moctapp · 2003
1 sentence

2024See Rhoden, 621 S.W.3d at 484; Davolt, 119 S.W.3d at 131-34 .

12024–2024
Alberswerth v. Alberswerth green
moctapp · 2006
1 sentence

2024See id.; see also Rosales, 597 S.W.3d at 685-86; Alberswerth, 184 S.W.3d at 100 ; cf. State v. Woods, 336 S.W.3d 473, 474-75 , 474 n.1, 475 n.2 (Mo. App. E.D. 2011) (holding a party preserved a claim relating to the admission of video deposition testimony for appeal when the party raised an objection pre-trial and objected to its admission at trial).

12024–2024
Harper v. Missouri Pacific Railroad green
illappct · 1994
2 sentences

1994R.R., 264 Ill.App.3d 238 , 201 Ill.Dec. 760 , 636 N.E.2d 1192 (1994), in which the railroad had a rule which threatened discipline, including termination, of employees who provided information about job-related accidents to anyone outside of the railroad.

1994R.R., 264 Ill.App.3d 238 , 201 Ill.Dec. 760 , 636 N.E.2d 1192 (1994), in which the railroad had a rule which threatened discipline, including termination, of employees who provided information about job-related accidents to anyone outside of the railroad.

11994–1994
Kilpatrick v. Texas & P. Ry. Co. green
ca2 · 1948
1 sentence

1965Co., 5 Cir., 166 F.2d 788 , and see particularly Annotation 43 A.L.R.2d 774 , “Power of state or state court to decline jurisdiction of action under Federal Employers’ Liability Act.” Furthermore, in this action the railroad does not challenge the court’s jurisdiction of the subject matter, a transitory tort action, and it does not question the validity of the service of process or of the attachment and garnishment, all problems sometimes injected into these cases.

11965–1965
State ex rel. School Fund v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. neutral
mo · 1884
1 sentence

1917In Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Commission, 206 U. S. 1 , the syllabus, which fairly reflects the opinion, reads: “It is within the power of a state railroad commission to compel a railroad company to make reasonable connections with other roads so as to promote the convenience of the traveling public, and an order requiring the running of an additional train for that purpose, if otherwise just and reasonable, is not inherently unjust and unreasonable because the running of such train will impose some pecuniary loss on the company.” In State v. Railroad, 239 M

11917–1917
Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Ohio green
· 1899
1 sentence

1917In Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Commission, 206 U. S. 1 , the syllabus, which fairly reflects the opinion, reads: “It is within the power of a state railroad commission to compel a railroad company to make reasonable connections with other roads so as to promote the convenience of the traveling public, and an order requiring the running of an additional train for that purpose, if otherwise just and reasonable, is not inherently unjust and unreasonable because the running of such train will impose some pecuniary loss on the company.” In State v. Railroad, 239 M

11917–1917
New York & New England Railroad v. Bristol green
· 1894
1 sentence

1917In Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Commission, 206 U. S. 1 , the syllabus, which fairly reflects the opinion, reads: “It is within the power of a state railroad commission to compel a railroad company to make reasonable connections with other roads so as to promote the convenience of the traveling public, and an order requiring the running of an additional train for that purpose, if otherwise just and reasonable, is not inherently unjust and unreasonable because the running of such train will impose some pecuniary loss on the company.” In State v. Railroad, 239 M

11917–1917
Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Comm'n green
scotus · 1907
2 sentences

1917In Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Commission, 206 U. S. 1 , the syllabus, which fairly reflects the opinion, reads: “It is within the power of a state railroad commission to compel a railroad company to make reasonable connections with other roads so as to promote the convenience of the traveling public, and an order requiring the running of an additional train for that purpose, if otherwise just and reasonable, is not inherently unjust and unreasonable because the running of such train will impose some pecuniary loss on the company.” In State v. Railroad, 239 M

1917In Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Commission, 206 U. S. 1 , the syllabus, which fairly reflects the opinion, reads: “It is within the power of a state railroad commission to compel a railroad company to make reasonable connections with other roads so as to promote the convenience of the traveling public, and an order requiring the running of an additional train for that purpose, if otherwise just and reasonable, is not inherently unjust and unreasonable because the running of such train will impose some pecuniary loss on the company.” In State v. Railroad, 239 M

11917–1917

Where else courts name it

NJ 13 (1980–2025) IL 7 (1960–2024) NY 7 (1897–2009) MS 6 (1954–2013) TX 6 (1958–2024) GA 5 (1958–2026) MO 5 (1917–2024) MA 3 (1938–2005) MI 3 (1906–1977) KY 3 (1941–1942) WA 3 (1966–2002) UT 3 (1983–2003) FL 2 (1964–1966) PA 2 (1970–2016) NE 2 (1887–1998) MD 2 (1963–1997) OH 2 (1993–2004) OR 2 (1958–1963) LA 2 (1970–1976)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check