Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 New York opinions name it 2 courts 1897–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Frank v. Fortuna Energy, Inc.
green
1 sentence2009We again conclude that, by her own submissions, Mazzoni raised an issue of fact concerning her entitlement to partial summary judgment on her adverse possession cause of action based on the “usually cultivated or improved” ground, excluding that portion of the property used and maintained by the Railroad defendants and a subsurface drainage pipe maintained by the Village (see generally Frank v Fortuna Energy, Inc., 49 AD3d 1294 [2008]). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Danbois v. New York Central Railroad
green
1 sentence1979Co. ( 12 NY2d 234 ), relied upon by the trial court, held that a violation of a railroad rule may be admissible as some evidence of negligence when the rule sets forth a standard of care. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
New York & Queens Electric Light & Power Co. v. Delaney
neutral
1 sentence1976Light & Power Co. v Delaney, 229 NY 184 ). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Cooley v. . Lobdell
green
1 sentence1959(Dunckel v. Dunckel, 141 N. Y. 427 ; Cooley v. Lobdell, supra.) However, prior to any steps taken to enforce the agreement, and prior to the recording thereof, Valentine and wife conveyed the entire farm to Lyon by the aforesaid deed. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Dunckel v. . Dunckel
neutral
1 sentence1959(Dunckel v. Dunckel, 141 N. Y. 427 ; Cooley v. Lobdell, supra.) However, prior to any steps taken to enforce the agreement, and prior to the recording thereof, Valentine and wife conveyed the entire farm to Lyon by the aforesaid deed. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Bank of Commerce v. Tennessee Ex Rel. Memphis
green
1 sentence1899This was approved in Bank of Commerce v. Tennessee ( 163 U. S. 416 ) and Galveston Railway Co. v. Texas (170 id. 226), and I can see no distinction between the principle of those cases, and of one in which a railroad has the privilege to extend its route by the purchase or condemnation of lands, as long as it has not exercised that privilege and acquired the land. | 1 | 1899–1899 |
Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Texas
green
1 sentence1899Co. v. Texas, 170 U. S. 226 , 18 Sup. Ct. 603; and I can see no distinction between the principle of those cases and of one where a railroad has the privilege to extend its route by the purchase or condemnation of lands, as long as it has not exercised that privilege and acquired the land. | 1 | 1899–1899 |
In Re Rochester Electric Railway Co.
neutral
1 sentence1897Co., 123 N. Y. 351, 358 .) The abutting owner has an interest which permits his intervention to prevent the laying of such a railroad in violation of the statute. | 1 | 1897–1897 |
Fanning v. . Osborne
neutral
1 sentence1897(Fanning v. Osborne, 102 N. Y. 441 .) No other question requires consideration. | 1 | 1897–1897 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.