time period rule (Mississippi) · Go Syfert
← Mississippi issues

time period rule in Mississippi

5 Mississippi opinions name it 1 courts 2005–2009 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Nelson v. Adams USA, Inc.green
scotus · 2000 · cited in 2 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2006–2009
2 sentences

2009The United States Supreme Court, in looking at the federal counterpart to this rule, Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(c)(3)(B), noted that this “subsection applies only in cases involving ‘a mistake concerning the identity of the proper party.’ ” Nelson v. Adams USA, Inc., 529 U.S. 460, 467 , 120 S.Ct. 1579 , 146 L.Ed.2d 530, n. 1 (2000) (quoting Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(c)(3)(B)).

2009The United States Supreme Court, in looking at the federal counterpart to this rule, Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(c)(3)(B), noted that this “subsection applies only in cases involving ‘a mistake concerning the identity of the proper party.’ ” Nelson v. Adams USA, Inc., 529 U.S. 460, 467 , 120 S.Ct. 1579 , 146 L.Ed.2d 530, n. 1 (2000) (quoting Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(c)(3)(B)).

12

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Ralph Walker, Inc. v. Gallagher green
miss · 2006
2 sentences

2006The purpose of the second prong of Rule 15(c) "is to allow some leeway to a party who made a mistake, so long as the party does what is required within the time period under the rule." Walker, 926 So.2d at 896 .

2005The purpose of the second prong of Rule 15(c) “is to allow some leeway to a party who made a mistake, so long as the party does what is required within the time period under the rule.” Walker, 926 So. 2d at 896 .

22005–2006
Curry v. Turner green
miss · 2002
1 sentence

2008Curry, 832 So. 2d at 513 .[1 ] The purpose of this rule is to allow some leeway to a party who made a mistake, so long as the party does what is required within the time period under the rule.

12008–2008

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MS § Miss. Code Ann. § 15-1-36 (5)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

OK 7 (1991–2020) FL 6 (1978–2026) ID 5 (1999–2011) MS 5 (2005–2009) IN 4 (1972–2010) CA 3 (1989–2003) OH 3 (2004–2026) NC 2 (2022–2022) CO 2 (2000–2018) WI 2 (2020–2020) NY 2 (1987–1992) TX 2 (1997–2008) ND 2 (2024–2024) MA 2 (2007–2018) PA 2 (1986–2005)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check