time period rule (Idaho) · Go Syfert
← Idaho issues

time period rule in Idaho

5 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2011 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Campbell v. Reagangreen
idaho · 2007 · cited in 2 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2008–2011
2 sentences

2011“If a plaintiff fails to make any attempt at service within the time period of the rule, it is likely that a court will find no showing of good cause.” Id. at 377 , 987 P.2d at 289 ; see also Campbell v. Reagan, 144 Idaho 254, 257 , 159 P.3d 891, 894 (2007).

2011“If a plaintiff fails to make any attempt at service within the time period of the rule, it is likely that a court will find no showing of good cause.” Id. at 377 , 987 P.2d at 289 ; see also Campbell v. Reagan, 144 Idaho 254, 257 , 159 P.3d 891, 894 (2007).

22
Gambino v. Village of Oakbrookgreen
flmd · 1995 · cited in 2 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1999–2010
2 sentences

2010See also, Gambino v. Village of Oakbrook, 164 F.R.D. 271, 274 (M.D.

1999See Gambino, supra 164 F.R.D. at 274 .

22
Martin v. Hoblitgreen
idaho · 1999 · cited in 4 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2007–2011
2 sentences

2011“If a plaintiff fails to make any attempt at service within the time period of the rule, it is likely that a court will find no showing of good cause.” Id. at 377 , 987 P.2d at 289 ; see also Campbell v. Reagan, 144 Idaho 254, 257 , 159 P.3d 891, 894 (2007).

2011“If a plaintiff fails to make any attempt at service within the time period of the rule, it is likely that a court will find no showing of good cause.” Id. at 377 , 987 P.2d at 289 ; see also Campbell v. Reagan, 144 Idaho 254, 257 , 159 P.3d 891, 894 (2007).

14

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Where else courts name it

OK 7 (1991–2020) FL 6 (1978–2026) ID 5 (1999–2011) MS 5 (2005–2009) IN 4 (1972–2010) CA 3 (1989–2003) OH 3 (2004–2026) NC 2 (2022–2022) CO 2 (2000–2018) WI 2 (2020–2020) NY 2 (1987–1992) TX 2 (1997–2008) ND 2 (2024–2024) MA 2 (2007–2018) PA 2 (1986–2005)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check