5 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kea v. Stategreen2 sentences2011This Court’s decision was based on the failure “to instruct the jury in accordance with the two-witness rule as required in perjury cases.” Id. at 361 (¶ 10). 2011This Court also held that Robert’s and Lisa’s passports should not have been admitted into evidence to prove that Robert and Lisa “were traveling in Turkey at the time witnesses claimed to have seen [Robert] removing items from [Albert’s] home.” Id. at 363 (¶ 16). | 1 | 1 |
Weiler v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2008Id. at 538. | 1 | 1 |
Lea v. Stategreen1 sentence1999See generally Lea v. State, 64 Miss. 278 , 1 So. 235 (1887); Johnson v. State, 122 Miss. 16 , 84 So. 140 (1920); Gordon v. State, 158 Miss. 185 , 128 So. 769 (1930); Horn v. State, 186 Miss. 455 , 191 So. 282 (1939); Clanton v. State, 210 Miss. 700 , 50 So.2d 567 (1951); Tribble v. State, 210 Miss. 604 , 50 So.2d 148 (Miss.1951); Nash v. State, 244 Miss. 857 , 147 So.2d 499 (1962); Hamilton v. State, 197 So.2d 469 (Miss.1967); Brewer v. State, 233 So.2d 779 (Miss.1970); McFee v. State, 510 So.2d 790 (Miss.1987) (finding defendant’s two prior conflicting sworn statements plus the testimony of d | 1 | 1 |
Hourie v. Stategreen2 sentences1999See generally People v. Fueston, 749 P.2d 952, 958 (Colo. 1988); Hourie v. State, 298 Md. 50 , 467 A.2d 1016, 1021 (1983). 1999See generally People v. Fueston, 749 P.2d 952, 958 (Colo. 1988); Hourie v. State, 298 Md. 50 , 467 A.2d 1016, 1021 (1983). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Fuestongreen1 sentence1999See generally People v. Fueston, 749 P.2d 952, 958 (Colo. 1988); Hourie v. State, 298 Md. 50 , 467 A.2d 1016, 1021 (1983). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Borattogreen2 sentences1994State v. Boratto, 80 N.J. 506 , 404 A.2d 604, 606 (1979) (testimony of two handwriting experts that signature on will was forgery); Goins v. United States, 99 F.2d 147, 149 (4th Cir.1938) (genuine signature on hotel registration card placed defendant in Chicago at specific time although he claimed to have been elsewhere). 1994State v. Boratto, 80 N.J. 506 , 404 A.2d 604, 606 (1979) (testimony of two handwriting experts that signature on will was forgery); Goins v. United States, 99 F.2d 147, 149 (4th Cir.1938) (genuine signature on hotel registration card placed defendant in Chicago at specific time although he claimed to have been elsewhere). | 1 | 1 |
Goins v. United Statesgreen1 sentence1994State v. Boratto, 80 N.J. 506 , 404 A.2d 604, 606 (1979) (testimony of two handwriting experts that signature on will was forgery); Goins v. United States, 99 F.2d 147, 149 (4th Cir.1938) (genuine signature on hotel registration card placed defendant in Chicago at specific time although he claimed to have been elsewhere). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nash v. State
green
2 sentences1999See generally Lea v. State, 64 Miss. 278 , 1 So. 235 (1887); Johnson v. State, 122 Miss. 16 , 84 So. 140 (1920); Gordon v. State, 158 Miss. 185 , 128 So. 769 (1930); Horn v. State, 186 Miss. 455 , 191 So. 282 (1939); Clanton v. State, 210 Miss. 700 , 50 So.2d 567 (1951); Tribble v. State, 210 Miss. 604 , 50 So.2d 148 (Miss.1951); Nash v. State, 244 Miss. 857 , 147 So.2d 499 (1962); Hamilton v. State, 197 So.2d 469 (Miss.1967); Brewer v. State, 233 So.2d 779 (Miss.1970); McFee v. State, 510 So.2d 790 (Miss.1987) (finding defendant’s two prior conflicting sworn statements plus the testimony of d 1999See generally Lea v. State, 64 Miss. 278 , 1 So. 235 (1887); Johnson v. State, 122 Miss. 16 , 84 So. 140 (1920); Gordon v. State, 158 Miss. 185 , 128 So. 769 (1930); Horn v. State, 186 Miss. 455 , 191 So. 282 (1939); Clanton v. State, 210 Miss. 700 , 50 So.2d 567 (1951); Tribble v. State, 210 Miss. 604 , 50 So.2d 148 (Miss.1951); Nash v. State, 244 Miss. 857 , 147 So.2d 499 (1962); Hamilton v. State, 197 So.2d 469 (Miss.1967); Brewer v. State, 233 So.2d 779 (Miss.1970); McFee v. State, 510 So.2d 790 (Miss.1987) (finding defendant’s two prior conflicting sworn statements plus the testimony of d | 2 | 1994–1999 |
Brewer v. State
green
2 sentences1999See generally Lea v. State, 64 Miss. 278 , 1 So. 235 (1887); Johnson v. State, 122 Miss. 16 , 84 So. 140 (1920); Gordon v. State, 158 Miss. 185 , 128 So. 769 (1930); Horn v. State, 186 Miss. 455 , 191 So. 282 (1939); Clanton v. State, 210 Miss. 700 , 50 So.2d 567 (1951); Tribble v. State, 210 Miss. 604 , 50 So.2d 148 (Miss.1951); Nash v. State, 244 Miss. 857 , 147 So.2d 499 (1962); Hamilton v. State, 197 So.2d 469 (Miss.1967); Brewer v. State, 233 So.2d 779 (Miss.1970); McFee v. State, 510 So.2d 790 (Miss.1987) (finding defendant’s two prior conflicting sworn statements plus the testimony of d 1987Brewer v. State, 233 So.2d 779 (Miss. 1970). | 2 | 1987–1999 |
Johnson v. State
neutral
1 sentence1999See generally Lea v. State, 64 Miss. 278 , 1 So. 235 (1887); Johnson v. State, 122 Miss. 16 , 84 So. 140 (1920); Gordon v. State, 158 Miss. 185 , 128 So. 769 (1930); Horn v. State, 186 Miss. 455 , 191 So. 282 (1939); Clanton v. State, 210 Miss. 700 , 50 So.2d 567 (1951); Tribble v. State, 210 Miss. 604 , 50 So.2d 148 (Miss.1951); Nash v. State, 244 Miss. 857 , 147 So.2d 499 (1962); Hamilton v. State, 197 So.2d 469 (Miss.1967); Brewer v. State, 233 So.2d 779 (Miss.1970); McFee v. State, 510 So.2d 790 (Miss.1987) (finding defendant’s two prior conflicting sworn statements plus the testimony of d | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Tribble v. State
neutral
2 sentences1999See generally Lea v. State, 64 Miss. 278 , 1 So. 235 (1887); Johnson v. State, 122 Miss. 16 , 84 So. 140 (1920); Gordon v. State, 158 Miss. 185 , 128 So. 769 (1930); Horn v. State, 186 Miss. 455 , 191 So. 282 (1939); Clanton v. State, 210 Miss. 700 , 50 So.2d 567 (1951); Tribble v. State, 210 Miss. 604 , 50 So.2d 148 (Miss.1951); Nash v. State, 244 Miss. 857 , 147 So.2d 499 (1962); Hamilton v. State, 197 So.2d 469 (Miss.1967); Brewer v. State, 233 So.2d 779 (Miss.1970); McFee v. State, 510 So.2d 790 (Miss.1987) (finding defendant’s two prior conflicting sworn statements plus the testimony of d 1999See generally Lea v. State, 64 Miss. 278 , 1 So. 235 (1887); Johnson v. State, 122 Miss. 16 , 84 So. 140 (1920); Gordon v. State, 158 Miss. 185 , 128 So. 769 (1930); Horn v. State, 186 Miss. 455 , 191 So. 282 (1939); Clanton v. State, 210 Miss. 700 , 50 So.2d 567 (1951); Tribble v. State, 210 Miss. 604 , 50 So.2d 148 (Miss.1951); Nash v. State, 244 Miss. 857 , 147 So.2d 499 (1962); Hamilton v. State, 197 So.2d 469 (Miss.1967); Brewer v. State, 233 So.2d 779 (Miss.1970); McFee v. State, 510 So.2d 790 (Miss.1987) (finding defendant’s two prior conflicting sworn statements plus the testimony of d | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Clanton v. State
green
2 sentences1999See generally Lea v. State, 64 Miss. 278 , 1 So. 235 (1887); Johnson v. State, 122 Miss. 16 , 84 So. 140 (1920); Gordon v. State, 158 Miss. 185 , 128 So. 769 (1930); Horn v. State, 186 Miss. 455 , 191 So. 282 (1939); Clanton v. State, 210 Miss. 700 , 50 So.2d 567 (1951); Tribble v. State, 210 Miss. 604 , 50 So.2d 148 (Miss.1951); Nash v. State, 244 Miss. 857 , 147 So.2d 499 (1962); Hamilton v. State, 197 So.2d 469 (Miss.1967); Brewer v. State, 233 So.2d 779 (Miss.1970); McFee v. State, 510 So.2d 790 (Miss.1987) (finding defendant’s two prior conflicting sworn statements plus the testimony of d 1999See generally Lea v. State, 64 Miss. 278 , 1 So. 235 (1887); Johnson v. State, 122 Miss. 16 , 84 So. 140 (1920); Gordon v. State, 158 Miss. 185 , 128 So. 769 (1930); Horn v. State, 186 Miss. 455 , 191 So. 282 (1939); Clanton v. State, 210 Miss. 700 , 50 So.2d 567 (1951); Tribble v. State, 210 Miss. 604 , 50 So.2d 148 (Miss.1951); Nash v. State, 244 Miss. 857 , 147 So.2d 499 (1962); Hamilton v. State, 197 So.2d 469 (Miss.1967); Brewer v. State, 233 So.2d 779 (Miss.1970); McFee v. State, 510 So.2d 790 (Miss.1987) (finding defendant’s two prior conflicting sworn statements plus the testimony of d | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Hamilton v. State
green
1 sentence1999See generally Lea v. State, 64 Miss. 278 , 1 So. 235 (1887); Johnson v. State, 122 Miss. 16 , 84 So. 140 (1920); Gordon v. State, 158 Miss. 185 , 128 So. 769 (1930); Horn v. State, 186 Miss. 455 , 191 So. 282 (1939); Clanton v. State, 210 Miss. 700 , 50 So.2d 567 (1951); Tribble v. State, 210 Miss. 604 , 50 So.2d 148 (Miss.1951); Nash v. State, 244 Miss. 857 , 147 So.2d 499 (1962); Hamilton v. State, 197 So.2d 469 (Miss.1967); Brewer v. State, 233 So.2d 779 (Miss.1970); McFee v. State, 510 So.2d 790 (Miss.1987) (finding defendant’s two prior conflicting sworn statements plus the testimony of d | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Horn v. State
green
2 sentences1999See generally Lea v. State, 64 Miss. 278 , 1 So. 235 (1887); Johnson v. State, 122 Miss. 16 , 84 So. 140 (1920); Gordon v. State, 158 Miss. 185 , 128 So. 769 (1930); Horn v. State, 186 Miss. 455 , 191 So. 282 (1939); Clanton v. State, 210 Miss. 700 , 50 So.2d 567 (1951); Tribble v. State, 210 Miss. 604 , 50 So.2d 148 (Miss.1951); Nash v. State, 244 Miss. 857 , 147 So.2d 499 (1962); Hamilton v. State, 197 So.2d 469 (Miss.1967); Brewer v. State, 233 So.2d 779 (Miss.1970); McFee v. State, 510 So.2d 790 (Miss.1987) (finding defendant’s two prior conflicting sworn statements plus the testimony of d 1999See generally Lea v. State, 64 Miss. 278 , 1 So. 235 (1887); Johnson v. State, 122 Miss. 16 , 84 So. 140 (1920); Gordon v. State, 158 Miss. 185 , 128 So. 769 (1930); Horn v. State, 186 Miss. 455 , 191 So. 282 (1939); Clanton v. State, 210 Miss. 700 , 50 So.2d 567 (1951); Tribble v. State, 210 Miss. 604 , 50 So.2d 148 (Miss.1951); Nash v. State, 244 Miss. 857 , 147 So.2d 499 (1962); Hamilton v. State, 197 So.2d 469 (Miss.1967); Brewer v. State, 233 So.2d 779 (Miss.1970); McFee v. State, 510 So.2d 790 (Miss.1987) (finding defendant’s two prior conflicting sworn statements plus the testimony of d | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Gordon v. State
green
2 sentences1999See generally Lea v. State, 64 Miss. 278 , 1 So. 235 (1887); Johnson v. State, 122 Miss. 16 , 84 So. 140 (1920); Gordon v. State, 158 Miss. 185 , 128 So. 769 (1930); Horn v. State, 186 Miss. 455 , 191 So. 282 (1939); Clanton v. State, 210 Miss. 700 , 50 So.2d 567 (1951); Tribble v. State, 210 Miss. 604 , 50 So.2d 148 (Miss.1951); Nash v. State, 244 Miss. 857 , 147 So.2d 499 (1962); Hamilton v. State, 197 So.2d 469 (Miss.1967); Brewer v. State, 233 So.2d 779 (Miss.1970); McFee v. State, 510 So.2d 790 (Miss.1987) (finding defendant’s two prior conflicting sworn statements plus the testimony of d 1999See generally Lea v. State, 64 Miss. 278 , 1 So. 235 (1887); Johnson v. State, 122 Miss. 16 , 84 So. 140 (1920); Gordon v. State, 158 Miss. 185 , 128 So. 769 (1930); Horn v. State, 186 Miss. 455 , 191 So. 282 (1939); Clanton v. State, 210 Miss. 700 , 50 So.2d 567 (1951); Tribble v. State, 210 Miss. 604 , 50 So.2d 148 (Miss.1951); Nash v. State, 244 Miss. 857 , 147 So.2d 499 (1962); Hamilton v. State, 197 So.2d 469 (Miss.1967); Brewer v. State, 233 So.2d 779 (Miss.1970); McFee v. State, 510 So.2d 790 (Miss.1987) (finding defendant’s two prior conflicting sworn statements plus the testimony of d | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Hale v. State
green
1 sentence1999See generally Lea v. State, 64 Miss. 278 , 1 So. 235 (1887); Johnson v. State, 122 Miss. 16 , 84 So. 140 (1920); Gordon v. State, 158 Miss. 185 , 128 So. 769 (1930); Horn v. State, 186 Miss. 455 , 191 So. 282 (1939); Clanton v. State, 210 Miss. 700 , 50 So.2d 567 (1951); Tribble v. State, 210 Miss. 604 , 50 So.2d 148 (Miss.1951); Nash v. State, 244 Miss. 857 , 147 So.2d 499 (1962); Hamilton v. State, 197 So.2d 469 (Miss.1967); Brewer v. State, 233 So.2d 779 (Miss.1970); McFee v. State, 510 So.2d 790 (Miss.1987) (finding defendant’s two prior conflicting sworn statements plus the testimony of d | 1 | 1999–1999 |
McFee v. State
green
1 sentence1999See generally Lea v. State, 64 Miss. 278 , 1 So. 235 (1887); Johnson v. State, 122 Miss. 16 , 84 So. 140 (1920); Gordon v. State, 158 Miss. 185 , 128 So. 769 (1930); Horn v. State, 186 Miss. 455 , 191 So. 282 (1939); Clanton v. State, 210 Miss. 700 , 50 So.2d 567 (1951); Tribble v. State, 210 Miss. 604 , 50 So.2d 148 (Miss.1951); Nash v. State, 244 Miss. 857 , 147 So.2d 499 (1962); Hamilton v. State, 197 So.2d 469 (Miss.1967); Brewer v. State, 233 So.2d 779 (Miss.1970); McFee v. State, 510 So.2d 790 (Miss.1987) (finding defendant’s two prior conflicting sworn statements plus the testimony of d | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Hogan v. State
green
1 sentence1999See generally Lea v. State, 64 Miss. 278 , 1 So. 235 (1887); Johnson v. State, 122 Miss. 16 , 84 So. 140 (1920); Gordon v. State, 158 Miss. 185 , 128 So. 769 (1930); Horn v. State, 186 Miss. 455 , 191 So. 282 (1939); Clanton v. State, 210 Miss. 700 , 50 So.2d 567 (1951); Tribble v. State, 210 Miss. 604 , 50 So.2d 148 (Miss.1951); Nash v. State, 244 Miss. 857 , 147 So.2d 499 (1962); Hamilton v. State, 197 So.2d 469 (Miss.1967); Brewer v. State, 233 So.2d 779 (Miss.1970); McFee v. State, 510 So.2d 790 (Miss.1987) (finding defendant’s two prior conflicting sworn statements plus the testimony of d | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Smallwood v. State
green
1 sentence1999See generally Lea v. State, 64 Miss. 278 , 1 So. 235 (1887); Johnson v. State, 122 Miss. 16 , 84 So. 140 (1920); Gordon v. State, 158 Miss. 185 , 128 So. 769 (1930); Horn v. State, 186 Miss. 455 , 191 So. 282 (1939); Clanton v. State, 210 Miss. 700 , 50 So.2d 567 (1951); Tribble v. State, 210 Miss. 604 , 50 So.2d 148 (Miss.1951); Nash v. State, 244 Miss. 857 , 147 So.2d 499 (1962); Hamilton v. State, 197 So.2d 469 (Miss.1967); Brewer v. State, 233 So.2d 779 (Miss.1970); McFee v. State, 510 So.2d 790 (Miss.1987) (finding defendant’s two prior conflicting sworn statements plus the testimony of d | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.