Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Hastinggreen2 sentences2011This approach effectively prevents “the protective shield of the Fifth Amendment” from being “converted into a sword that cuts back on the area of legitimate comment by the prosecutor on the weaknesses in the defense case.” [U.S. v.] Robinson, 485 U.S. [25,] 32, 108 S.Ct. 864 [ 99 L.Ed.2d 23 ] [(1988)] (quoting United States v. Hasting, 461 U.S. 499, 515 , 103 S.Ct. 1974, 1984 , 76 L.Ed.2d 96, 110 (1983) (Stevens, J., concurring) (citation omitted)). “[P]roseeutorial comment must be examined in context!.]” Robinson, 485 U.S. at 33 , 108 S.Ct. 864 . 2011This approach effectively prevents “the protective shield of the Fifth Amendment” from being “converted into a sword that cuts back on the area of legitimate comment by the prosecutor on the weaknesses in the defense case.” [U.S. v.] Robinson, 485 U.S. [25,] 32, 108 S.Ct. 864 [ 99 L.Ed.2d 23 ] [(1988)] (quoting United States v. Hasting, 461 U.S. 499, 515 , 103 S.Ct. 1974, 1984 , 76 L.Ed.2d 96, 110 (1983) (Stevens, J., concurring) (citation omitted)). “[P]roseeutorial comment must be examined in context!.]” Robinson, 485 U.S. at 33 , 108 S.Ct. 864 . | 5 | 5 |
Logan v. Stategreen2 sentences2011“When the statement is not an outright violation, this Court will review the facts on a case-by-case basis.” Wright, 958 So.2d at 166 [ (¶ 24) ] (citing Logan v. State, 773 So.2d 338, 348 [ (¶ 38) ] (Miss.2000)). 2008"When the statement is not an outright violation, this Court will review the facts on a case-by-case basis." Wright, 958 So.2d at 166 (citing Logan v. State, 773 So.2d 338, 348 (Miss.2000)). | 2 | 2 |
Delaware v. Van Arsdallgreen2 sentences2007But I do not believe the protective shield of the Fifth Amendment should be converted into a sword that cuts back on the area of legitimate comment by the prosecutor on the weaknesses in the defense case." United States v. Hasting, 461 U.S. 499, 515 [, 103 S.Ct. 1974 , 76 L.Ed.2d 96 ] (1983) (STEVENS, J., concurring) (citation omitted). . . . . "[The] central purpose of a criminal trial is to decide the factual question of the defendant's guilt or innocence, United States v. Nobles, 422 U.S. 225 [, 95 S.Ct. 2160 , 45 L.Ed.2d 141 ] (1975). . . ." Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673, 681 [, 10 2007But I do not believe the protective shield of the Fifth Amendment should be converted into a sword that cuts back on the area of legitimate comment by the prosecutor on the weaknesses in the defense case." United States v. Hasting, 461 U.S. 499, 515 [, 103 S.Ct. 1974 , 76 L.Ed.2d 96 ] (1983) (STEVENS, J., concurring) (citation omitted). . . . . "[The] central purpose of a criminal trial is to decide the factual question of the defendant's guilt or innocence, United States v. Nobles, 422 U.S. 225 [, 95 S.Ct. 2160 , 45 L.Ed.2d 141 ] (1975). . . ." Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673, 681 [, 10 | 2 | 2 |
Wright v. Stategreen2 sentences2011“When the statement is not an outright violation, this Court will review the facts on a case-by-case basis.” Wright, 958 So.2d at 166 [ (¶ 24) ] (citing Logan v. State, 773 So.2d 338, 348 [ (¶ 38) ] (Miss.2000)). 2008"When the statement is not an outright violation, this Court will review the facts on a case-by-case basis." Wright, 958 So.2d at 166 (citing Logan v. State, 773 So.2d 338, 348 (Miss.2000)). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Robinson
green
2 sentences2011This approach effectively prevents “the protective shield of the Fifth Amendment” from being “converted into a sword that cuts back on the area of legitimate comment by the prosecutor on the weaknesses in the defense case.” [U.S. v.] Robinson, 485 U.S. [25,] 32, 108 S.Ct. 864 [ 99 L.Ed.2d 23 ] [(1988)] (quoting United States v. Hasting, 461 U.S. 499, 515 , 103 S.Ct. 1974, 1984 , 76 L.Ed.2d 96, 110 (1983) (Stevens, J., concurring) (citation omitted)). “[P]roseeutorial comment must be examined in context!.]” Robinson, 485 U.S. at 33 , 108 S.Ct. 864 . 2011This approach effectively prevents “the protective shield of the Fifth Amendment” from being “converted into a sword that cuts back on the area of legitimate comment by the prosecutor on the weaknesses in the defense case.” [U.S. v.] Robinson, 485 U.S. [25,] 32, 108 S.Ct. 864 [ 99 L.Ed.2d 23 ] [(1988)] (quoting United States v. Hasting, 461 U.S. 499, 515 , 103 S.Ct. 1974, 1984 , 76 L.Ed.2d 96, 110 (1983) (Stevens, J., concurring) (citation omitted)). “[P]roseeutorial comment must be examined in context!.]” Robinson, 485 U.S. at 33 , 108 S.Ct. 864 . | 3 | 2004–2011 |
United States v. Nobles
green
2 sentences2007But I do not believe the protective shield of the Fifth Amendment should be converted into a sword that cuts back on the area of legitimate comment by the prosecutor on the weaknesses in the defense case." United States v. Hasting, 461 U.S. 499, 515 [, 103 S.Ct. 1974 , 76 L.Ed.2d 96 ] (1983) (STEVENS, J., concurring) (citation omitted). . . . . "[The] central purpose of a criminal trial is to decide the factual question of the defendant's guilt or innocence, United States v. Nobles, 422 U.S. 225 [, 95 S.Ct. 2160 , 45 L.Ed.2d 141 ] (1975). . . ." Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673, 681 [, 10 2007But I do not believe the protective shield of the Fifth Amendment should be converted into a sword that cuts back on the area of legitimate comment by the prosecutor on the weaknesses in the defense case." United States v. Hasting, 461 U.S. 499, 515 [, 103 S.Ct. 1974 , 76 L.Ed.2d 96 ] (1983) (STEVENS, J., concurring) (citation omitted). . . . . "[The] central purpose of a criminal trial is to decide the factual question of the defendant's guilt or innocence, United States v. Nobles, 422 U.S. 225 [, 95 S.Ct. 2160 , 45 L.Ed.2d 141 ] (1975). . . ." Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673, 681 [, 10 | 2 | 2005–2007 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.