monopoly or special privilege (North Carolina) · Go Syfert
← North Carolina issues

monopoly or special privilege in North Carolina

5 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1930–1985 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
State v. . Lockey neutral
nc · 1930
2 sentences

1948S. v. Lockey, 198 N. C. 551 , 152 S. E. 693 ; Georgia State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Friedmans’ Jewelers, Inc., 183 Ga. 669 , 189 S. E. 238 ; People v. Griffith, 280 Ill. 18 , 117 N. E. 195 ; Liggett Co. v. Baldridge, 278 U. S. 105 , 75 L.

1948S. v. Lockey, 198 N. C. 551 , 152 S. E. 693 ; Georgia State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Friedmans’ Jewelers, Inc., 183 Ga. 669 , 189 S. E. 238 ; People v. Griffith, 280 Ill. 18 , 117 N. E. 195 ; Liggett Co. v. Baldridge, 278 U. S. 105 , 75 L.

31938–1948
State v. Call green
nc · 1897
1 sentence

1985Id.

11985–1985
Louis K. Liggett Co. v. Baldridge green
scotus · 1928
1 sentence

1948S. v. Lockey, 198 N. C. 551 , 152 S. E. 693 ; Georgia State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Friedmans’ Jewelers, Inc., 183 Ga. 669 , 189 S. E. 238 ; People v. Griffith, 280 Ill. 18 , 117 N. E. 195 ; Liggett Co. v. Baldridge, 278 U. S. 105 , 75 L.

11948–1948
People v. Griffith green
ill · 1917
2 sentences

1948S. v. Lockey, 198 N. C. 551 , 152 S. E. 693 ; Georgia State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Friedmans’ Jewelers, Inc., 183 Ga. 669 , 189 S. E. 238 ; People v. Griffith, 280 Ill. 18 , 117 N. E. 195 ; Liggett Co. v. Baldridge, 278 U. S. 105 , 75 L.

1948S. v. Lockey, 198 N. C. 551 , 152 S. E. 693 ; Georgia State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Friedmans’ Jewelers, Inc., 183 Ga. 669 , 189 S. E. 238 ; People v. Griffith, 280 Ill. 18 , 117 N. E. 195 ; Liggett Co. v. Baldridge, 278 U. S. 105 , 75 L.

11948–1948
Georgia State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Friedmans' Jewelers Inc. green
ga · 1936
2 sentences

1948S. v. Lockey, 198 N. C. 551 , 152 S. E. 693 ; Georgia State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Friedmans’ Jewelers, Inc., 183 Ga. 669 , 189 S. E. 238 ; People v. Griffith, 280 Ill. 18 , 117 N. E. 195 ; Liggett Co. v. Baldridge, 278 U. S. 105 , 75 L.

1948S. v. Lockey, 198 N. C. 551 , 152 S. E. 693 ; Georgia State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Friedmans’ Jewelers, Inc., 183 Ga. 669 , 189 S. E. 238 ; People v. Griffith, 280 Ill. 18 , 117 N. E. 195 ; Liggett Co. v. Baldridge, 278 U. S. 105 , 75 L.

11948–1948
State v. . Hicks neutral
nc · 1907
1 sentence

1930The door stands open to all who possess the requisite age and good character and can pass the examination which is exacted of all applicants alike.” The General Assembly has power to regulate those engaged in the practice of “dentistry.” S. v. Hicks, 143 N. C., 689 .

11930–1930

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check