Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 1972–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Spears v. Spearsgreen2 sentences2016We also note that in the Order on Purge Condition Noncompliance, the trial court repeated this error when it ordered that defendant's "civil contempt shall continue unless he makes payments consistent with the February 2013 Order and the purge conditions set by this Court." Id. at ----, 784 S.E.2d at 501 (citations omitted). 2016We also note that in the Order on Purge Condition Noncompliance, the trial court repeated this error when it ordered that defendant's "civil contempt shall continue unless he makes payments consistent with the February 2013 Order and the purge conditions set by this Court." Id. at ----, 784 S.E.2d at 501 (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bass v. Johnson
green
1 sentence2009However, in light of our duty to review a jury charge “contextually and in its entiretyf,]” Bass v. Johnson, 149 N.C. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Brooks v. McWhirter Grading Co., Inc.
green
2 sentences1995A repeated violation exists where there is a “subsequent violation by the same employer substantially similar to a prior violation or violations” when the employer knew or “should have known of the standard by virtue of the prior citation or citations.” Grading Co., 303 N.C. at 590 , 281 S.E.2d at 34 . 1995A repeated violation exists where there is a “subsequent violation by the same employer substantially similar to a prior violation or violations” when the employer knew or “should have known of the standard by virtue of the prior citation or citations.” Grading Co., 303 N.C. at 590 , 281 S.E.2d at 34 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
State v. Francis
green
2 sentences1975Immediately after such instructions, the court charged substantially as follows: “However, if you are satisfied that because of the number of attackers or their size or the fierceness of the attack or all three of those things put together the defendant believed from the circumstances that he was in danger of death or suffering great bodily harm and that the belief was reasonable under the circumstances as they appeared to him at that time and that the force was not excessive and that defendant was not the aggressor, then the defendant would have satisfied you of self-defense.” Defendant argue 1975Immediately after such instructions, the court charged substantially as follows: “However, if you are satisfied that because of the number of attackers or their size or the fierceness of the attack or all three of those things put together the defendant believed from the circumstances that he was in danger of death or suffering great bodily harm and that the belief was reasonable under the circumstances as they appeared to him at that time and that the force was not excessive and that defendant was not the aggressor, then the defendant would have satisfied you of self-defense.” Defendant argue | 1 | 1975–1975 |
State v. Murphy
green
2 sentences1972This constitutes kidnapping under our statute." In State v. Murphy, 280 N.C. 1 , 184 S.E.2d 845 (1971) the court repeated the rule that any carrying away is sufficient. 1972This constitutes kidnapping under our statute." In State v. Murphy, 280 N.C. 1 , 184 S.E.2d 845 (1971) the court repeated the rule that any carrying away is sufficient. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
State v. Reid
green
2 sentences1972The case closest in point to the one at bar is State v. Reid, 5 N.C.App. 424 , 168 S.E.2d 511 (1969) written by Parker, Judge, where the victim upon leaving his office located at his residence was encountered by two men as he rounded the corner of the garage. 1972The case closest in point to the one at bar is State v. Reid, 5 N.C.App. 424 , 168 S.E.2d 511 (1969) written by Parker, Judge, where the victim upon leaving his office located at his residence was encountered by two men as he rounded the corner of the garage. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.