Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Laing v. LIBERTY LOAN CO. OF SMITHFIELD, ETC.green2 sentences2013However, “[i]f a party’s failure to produce is shown to be due to inability fostered neither by its own conduct nor by circumstances within its control, it is exempt from the sanctions of the rule.” Laing v. Liberty Loan Co., 46 N.C. 2009This Court has also stated that "[i]f a party's failure to produce is shown to be due to inability fostered neither by its own conduct nor by circumstances within its control, it is exempt from the sanctions of the rule." Laing, 46 N.C. | 1 | 2 |
Hinson v. Jeffersongreen2 sentences1991Hinson v. Jefferson, 287 N.C. 422, 429 , 215 S.E.2d 102, 107 (1975). 1991Hinson v. Jefferson, 287 N.C. 422, 429 , 215 S.E.2d 102, 107 (1975). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Moore v. Mills
green
1 sentence2026Id. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Turner v. Duke University
green
2 sentences1995We have conducted a de novo review of this hearing, as prescribed by Turner v. Duke University, 325 N.C. 152 , 381 S.E.2d 706 , and we find no reversible error. 1995We have conducted a de novo review of this hearing, as prescribed by Turner v. Duke University, 325 N.C. 152 , 381 S.E.2d 706 , and we find no reversible error. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.