Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Sumstinegreen2 sentences1999See, State v. Sumstine, 239 Neb. 707 , 478 N.W.2d 240 (1991) (holding that final date for trial under § 29-1207 is determined by excluding date information is filed, counting forward 6 months, backing up 1 day, and then adding excludable time periods to that date); State v. Jones, 208 Neb. 641 , 305 N.W.2d 355 (1981). 1999See, State v. Sumstine, 239 Neb. 707 , 478 N.W.2d 240 (1991) (holding that final date for trial under § 29-1207 is determined by excluding date information is filed, counting forward 6 months, backing up 1 day, and then adding excludable time periods to that date); State v. Jones, 208 Neb. 641 , 305 N.W.2d 355 (1981). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Boslau
green
2 sentences2018Stat. § 29-1607 (Reissue 2016). [12,13] But, contrary to the foregoing practice, “in a case where a ‘direct information’ has been filed, the commence- ment of the 6-month period for speedy trial act purposes occurs upon either the finding of probable cause at a prelimi- nary hearing or the date the defendant waives the preliminary hearing.” State v. Boslau, 258 Neb. at 46 , 601 N.W.2d at 774 . 2018Stat. § 29-1607 (Reissue 2016). [12,13] But, contrary to the foregoing practice, “in a case where a ‘direct information’ has been filed, the commence- ment of the 6-month period for speedy trial act purposes occurs upon either the finding of probable cause at a prelimi- nary hearing or the date the defendant waives the preliminary hearing.” State v. Boslau, 258 Neb. at 46 , 601 N.W.2d at 774 . | 3 | 2001–2018 |
State v. Thompson
green
1 sentence2002State v. Thompson, 10 Neb. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Jones
green
2 sentences1999See, State v. Sumstine, 239 Neb. 707 , 478 N.W.2d 240 (1991) (holding that final date for trial under § 29-1207 is determined by excluding date information is filed, counting forward 6 months, backing up 1 day, and then adding excludable time periods to that date); State v. Jones, 208 Neb. 641 , 305 N.W.2d 355 (1981). 1999See, State v. Sumstine, 239 Neb. 707 , 478 N.W.2d 240 (1991) (holding that final date for trial under § 29-1207 is determined by excluding date information is filed, counting forward 6 months, backing up 1 day, and then adding excludable time periods to that date); State v. Jones, 208 Neb. 641 , 305 N.W.2d 355 (1981). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Kearns
green
2 sentences1999Certain of our prior opinions in direct information cases have utilized without analysis the date of a second information filed following a preliminary hearing finding probable cause, e.g., State v. *46 Thomas, supra, or the date of an amended information filed prior to the preliminary hearing, e.g., State v. Kearns, 245 Neb. 728 , 514 N.W.2d 844 (1994), as the commencement date for speedy trial act purposes, rather than the date of the finding of probable cause or the date the defendant waives the preliminary hearing, upon either of which dates the direct information gains its status as a tru 1999Certain of our prior opinions in direct information cases have utilized without analysis the date of a second information filed following a preliminary hearing finding probable cause, e.g., State v. *46 Thomas, supra, or the date of an amended information filed prior to the preliminary hearing, e.g., State v. Kearns, 245 Neb. 728 , 514 N.W.2d 844 (1994), as the commencement date for speedy trial act purposes, rather than the date of the finding of probable cause or the date the defendant waives the preliminary hearing, upon either of which dates the direct information gains its status as a tru | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.