Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
DeVaux v. DeVaux
red
2 sentences2002DeVaux v. DeVaux, 245 Neb. 611 , 514 N.W.2d 640 (1994). 2002DeVaux v. DeVaux, 245 Neb. 611 , 514 N.W.2d 640 (1994). | 2 | 1995–2002 |
Graham v. Waggener
green
2 sentences1996Lincoln Lumber Co. v. Fowler, supra; Kuskie v. Adams Bank & Trust of Madrid, 248 Neb. 18 , 531 N.W.2d 921 (1995); Hangman v. Bruening, supra. In Graham v. Waggener, 219 Neb. 907 , 367 N.W.2d 707 (1985), the appellant flagrantly ignored the doctrine of res judicata and pursued a second action and appeal. 1996Lincoln Lumber Co. v. Fowler, supra; Kuskie v. Adams Bank & Trust of Madrid, 248 Neb. 18 , 531 N.W.2d 921 (1995); Hangman v. Bruening, supra. In Graham v. Waggener, 219 Neb. 907 , 367 N.W.2d 707 (1985), the appellant flagrantly ignored the doctrine of res judicata and pursued a second action and appeal. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Kuskie v. Adams Bank & Trust of Madrid
green
2 sentences1996Lincoln Lumber Co. v. Fowler, supra; Kuskie v. Adams Bank & Trust of Madrid, 248 Neb. 18 , 531 N.W.2d 921 (1995); Hangman v. Bruening, supra. In Graham v. Waggener, 219 Neb. 907 , 367 N.W.2d 707 (1985), the appellant flagrantly ignored the doctrine of res judicata and pursued a second action and appeal. 1996Lincoln Lumber Co. v. Fowler, supra; Kuskie v. Adams Bank & Trust of Madrid, 248 Neb. 18 , 531 N.W.2d 921 (1995); Hangman v. Bruening, supra. In Graham v. Waggener, 219 Neb. 907 , 367 N.W.2d 707 (1985), the appellant flagrantly ignored the doctrine of res judicata and pursued a second action and appeal. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Hangman v. Bruening
green
1 sentence1995Id. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Farmers State Bank v. Germer
green
2 sentences1994Dakota Title v. World-Wide Steel Sys., 238 Neb. 519 , 471 N.W.2d 430 (1991); Farmers State Bank v. Germer, 231 Neb. 572 , 437 N.W.2d 463 (1989). 1994Dakota Title v. World-Wide Steel Sys., 238 Neb. 519 , 471 N.W.2d 430 (1991); Farmers State Bank v. Germer, 231 Neb. 572 , 437 N.W.2d 463 (1989). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Dakota Title & Escrow Co. v. World-Wide Steel Systems, Inc.
green
2 sentences1994Dakota Title v. World-Wide Steel Sys., 238 Neb. 519 , 471 N.W.2d 430 (1991); Farmers State Bank v. Germer, 231 Neb. 572 , 437 N.W.2d 463 (1989). 1994Dakota Title v. World-Wide Steel Sys., 238 Neb. 519 , 471 N.W.2d 430 (1991); Farmers State Bank v. Germer, 231 Neb. 572 , 437 N.W.2d 463 (1989). | 1 | 1994–1994 |