staleness claim (Nebraska) · Go Syfert
← Nebraska issues

staleness claim in Nebraska

5 Nebraska opinions name it 1 courts 1906–1983 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Hawley v. Von Lanken green
neb · 1906
2 sentences

1945And in Hawley v. Von Lanken, 75 Neb. 597 , 106 N. W. 456 , we are also committed to the doctrine that, “Where the laches of the plaintiff and the staleness of his claim are apparent from the petition, objection may be taken by demurrer.” “In the case of Wood v. Carpenter, 101 U. S. 135 , Justice Swayne said: ‘Statutes of limitation are vital to the welfare of society and are favored in the law.

1945And in Hawley v. Von Lanken, 75 Neb. 597 , 106 N. W. 456 , we are also committed to the doctrine that, “Where the laches of the plaintiff and the staleness of his claim are apparent from the petition, objection may be taken by demurrer.” “In the case of Wood v. Carpenter, 101 U. S. 135 , Justice Swayne said: ‘Statutes of limitation are vital to the welfare of society and are favored in the law.

31935–1945
Bend v. Marsh green
neb · 1945
2 sentences

1983Kozina v. Watkins Lumber Co., *656 146 Neb. 594 , 20 N.W.2d 606 (1945); Bend v. Marsh, 145 Neb. 780 , 18 N.W.2d 106 (1945).

1983Kozina v. Watkins Lumber Co., *656 146 Neb. 594 , 20 N.W.2d 606 (1945); Bend v. Marsh, 145 Neb. 780 , 18 N.W.2d 106 (1945).

11983–1983
Kozina v. J. B. Watkins Lumber Co. green
neb · 1945
2 sentences

1983Kozina v. Watkins Lumber Co., *656 146 Neb. 594 , 20 N.W.2d 606 (1945); Bend v. Marsh, 145 Neb. 780 , 18 N.W.2d 106 (1945).

1983Kozina v. Watkins Lumber Co., *656 146 Neb. 594 , 20 N.W.2d 606 (1945); Bend v. Marsh, 145 Neb. 780 , 18 N.W.2d 106 (1945).

11983–1983
Wood v. Carpenter green
scotus · 1879
1 sentence

1945And in Hawley v. Von Lanken, 75 Neb. 597 , 106 N. W. 456 , we are also committed to the doctrine that, “Where the laches of the plaintiff and the staleness of his claim are apparent from the petition, objection may be taken by demurrer.” “In the case of Wood v. Carpenter, 101 U. S. 135 , Justice Swayne said: ‘Statutes of limitation are vital to the welfare of society and are favored in the law.

11945–1945
Abraham v. Ordway green
scotus · 1895
1 sentence

1906Williams v. First Presbyterian Society, 1 Ohio St. 478 ; Solomon v. Solomon, 81 Ala, 505; Furlong v. Riley, 103 Ill. 628 ; Abraham v. Ordway, 158 U. S. 416 , 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 894.

11906–1906
Furlong v. Riley neutral
ill · 1882
1 sentence

1906Williams v. First Presbyterian Society, 1 Ohio St. 478 ; Solomon v. Solomon, 81 Ala, 505; Furlong v. Riley, 103 Ill. 628 ; Abraham v. Ordway, 158 U. S. 416 , 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 894.

11906–1906

Where else courts name it

OH 10 (1913–2024) PA 8 (1947–2025) OR 5 (1918–2026) NE 5 (1906–1983) ID 5 (1908–2022) IL 4 (1873–2014) NM 4 (1901–2006) MA 4 (1995–2024) KY 3 (1912–2026) TX 3 (2000–2017) CA 2 (1999–2009) CO 2 (1895–1895) AL 2 (1852–1904) WA 2 (2009–2009) AZ 2 (1897–2020) IA 2 (2022–2023) MO 2 (1929–2019) LA 2 (1984–1988) IN 2 (1996–2019) CT 2 (1988–2009) MI 2 (1906–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check