attention bar (New Jersey) · Go Syfert
← New Jersey issues

attention bar in New Jersey

5 New Jersey opinions name it 3 courts 1926–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
McKenney v. Jersey City Medical Center green
nj · 2001
2 sentences

2019Id. at 369 , 771 A.2d 1153 .

2019Id. at 369 , 771 A.2d 1153 .

12019–2019
Viscik v. Fowler Equipment Co., Inc. green
nj · 2002
2 sentences

2016See R. 2:10-1; Viscik, supra, 173 N.J. at 20 , 800 A2d 826 (ordering new trial where trial court instruction “essentially focused the jury’s attention on a claim not at issue in the case and mixed two theories, pretext and reasonable accommodation, that are completely and purposefully distinct from one another”). 7 Plaintiff is entitled to a new trial.

2016See R. 2:10-1; Viscik, supra, 173 N.J. at 20 , 800 A2d 826 (ordering new trial where trial court instruction “essentially focused the jury’s attention on a claim not at issue in the case and mixed two theories, pretext and reasonable accommodation, that are completely and purposefully distinct from one another”). 7 Plaintiff is entitled to a new trial.

12016–2016
Dilione v. Vogel's Department Store neutral
njsuperctappdiv · 1949
1 sentence

1950Dilione v. Vogel's *211 Department Store, 2 N.J.

11950–1950
Nelson v. Wergland neutral
njch · 1929
1 sentence

1931This was called to the attention of the bar in Nelson v. Wergland, 104 N.J.

11931–1931
Brown v. Brown neutral
njch · 1924
1 sentence

1926In the later case of Brown v. Brown, supra , the chancellor has again brought this matter of practice to the attention of the bar.

11926–1926

Where else courts name it

TX 46 (1913–2023) MS 21 (1950–2017) CA 21 (1930–2026) NY 15 (1943–2025) PA 14 (1936–2018) ME 13 (2003–2024) OH 11 (1967–2024) IL 10 (1949–2023) MO 10 (1906–1993) WA 8 (1971–2026) AL 7 (1931–1994) NM 7 (1925–2023) FL 7 (1967–2015) CT 7 (1953–2018) GA 6 (1958–2023) MA 6 (1985–2012) OR 5 (1952–2017) NJ 5 (1926–2019) WI 4 (1887–2002) IN 4 (1979–2025) OK 4 (1915–1940) LA 4 (1983–1997) IA 4 (1934–2024) HI 3 (1994–2012) MD 3 (1990–1997) NE 3 (1942–1994) ND 3 (1998–2023) DC 2 (1983–2002) UT 2 (2001–2020) NH 2 (1977–1990) VA 2 (2006–2019) TN 2 (1970–2025) NC 2 (1942–1970) ID 2 (1980–1995) MN 2 (1950–1978) SC 2 (1933–1945) AK 2 (1979–1995) MI 2 (1987–1997) CO 2 (1994–2016) AR 2 (1956–1979)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check