attention bar (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

attention bar in Washington

8 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1971–2026 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
United States v. Mack Brown, Jr.green
ca2 · 1978 · cited in 3 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2011–2015
2 sentences

2015Restraint ofHilton not commit a Brady violation by not bringing the evidence to the attention of the defense.'" Raley v. Ylst, 470 F.3d 792,804 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting United States v. Brown, 582 F.2d 197,200 (2d Cir.l978)).

2011For purposes of Brady , there is no government suppression where the "`defendant is aware of the essential facts enabling him to take advantage of any exculpatory evidence[;] the Government does not commit a Brady violation by not bringing the evidence to the attention of the defense.'" Raley, 470 F.3d at 804 (quoting Brown, 582 F.2d at 200 ).

13
David A. Raley v. Eddie Ylst, Acting Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentingreen
ca9 · 2006 · cited in 3 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2011–2015
2 sentences

2015Restraint ofHilton not commit a Brady violation by not bringing the evidence to the attention of the defense.'" Raley v. Ylst, 470 F.3d 792,804 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting United States v. Brown, 582 F.2d 197,200 (2d Cir.l978)).

2011For purposes of Brady , there is no government suppression where the "`defendant is aware of the essential facts enabling him to take advantage of any exculpatory evidence[;] the Government does not commit a Brady violation by not bringing the evidence to the attention of the defense.'" Raley, 470 F.3d at 804 (quoting Brown, 582 F.2d at 200 ).

13
State v. Mutchgreen
wash · 2011 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022It was definitively established that “a separate and distinct act” instruction is not essential in Mutch, 171 Wn.2d at 663 (internal quotation marks omitted).

11
State v. Mullengreen
wash · 2011 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015Mullen, 171 Wn.2d at 896 (footnote omitted).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Malone neutral
wash · 1986
2 sentences

2026Disciplinary Proceeding Against Haskell, 136 Wn.2d 300, 321 , 962 P.2d 813 (1998) (attorney’s unusual misconduct had been considered in only one, recent case); In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against McLendon, 120 Wn.2d 761, 773 , 845 P.2d 1006 (1993) (extraordinary mitigation due to “the existence of bipolar disorder during all relevant times . . . and . . . the abatement of symptoms and misconduct following proper diagnosis and treatment”); In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Malone, 107 Wn.2d 263, 265 , 728 P.2d 1029 (1986) (attorney “himself had brought the trust account discrepancies to t

2026Disciplinary Proceeding Against Haskell, 136 Wn.2d 300, 321 , 962 P.2d 813 (1998) (attorney’s unusual misconduct had been considered in only one, recent case); In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against McLendon, 120 Wn.2d 761, 773 , 845 P.2d 1006 (1993) (extraordinary mitigation due to “the existence of bipolar disorder during all relevant times . . . and . . . the abatement of symptoms and misconduct following proper diagnosis and treatment”); In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Malone, 107 Wn.2d 263, 265 , 728 P.2d 1029 (1986) (attorney “himself had brought the trust account discrepancies to t

32003–2026
In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Salvesen green
wash · 1980
2 sentences

2026Disciplinary Proceeding Against Haskell, 136 Wn.2d 300, 321 , 962 P.2d 813 (1998) (attorney’s unusual misconduct had been considered in only one, recent case); In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against McLendon, 120 Wn.2d 761, 773 , 845 P.2d 1006 (1993) (extraordinary mitigation due to “the existence of bipolar disorder during all relevant times . . . and . . . the abatement of symptoms and misconduct following proper diagnosis and treatment”); In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Malone, 107 Wn.2d 263, 265 , 728 P.2d 1029 (1986) (attorney “himself had brought the trust account discrepancies to t

2026Disciplinary Proceeding Against Haskell, 136 Wn.2d 300, 321 , 962 P.2d 813 (1998) (attorney’s unusual misconduct had been considered in only one, recent case); In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against McLendon, 120 Wn.2d 761, 773 , 845 P.2d 1006 (1993) (extraordinary mitigation due to “the existence of bipolar disorder during all relevant times . . . and . . . the abatement of symptoms and misconduct following proper diagnosis and treatment”); In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Malone, 107 Wn.2d 263, 265 , 728 P.2d 1029 (1986) (attorney “himself had brought the trust account discrepancies to t

12026–2026
In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Haskell green
wash · 1998
1 sentence

2026Disciplinary Proceeding Against Haskell, 136 Wn.2d 300, 321 , 962 P.2d 813 (1998) (attorney’s unusual misconduct had been considered in only one, recent case); In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against McLendon, 120 Wn.2d 761, 773 , 845 P.2d 1006 (1993) (extraordinary mitigation due to “the existence of bipolar disorder during all relevant times . . . and . . . the abatement of symptoms and misconduct following proper diagnosis and treatment”); In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Malone, 107 Wn.2d 263, 265 , 728 P.2d 1029 (1986) (attorney “himself had brought the trust account discrepancies to t

12026–2026
In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against Haskell green
wash · 1998
1 sentence

2026Disciplinary Proceeding Against Haskell, 136 Wn.2d 300, 321 , 962 P.2d 813 (1998) (attorney’s unusual misconduct had been considered in only one, recent case); In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against McLendon, 120 Wn.2d 761, 773 , 845 P.2d 1006 (1993) (extraordinary mitigation due to “the existence of bipolar disorder during all relevant times . . . and . . . the abatement of symptoms and misconduct following proper diagnosis and treatment”); In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Malone, 107 Wn.2d 263, 265 , 728 P.2d 1029 (1986) (attorney “himself had brought the trust account discrepancies to t

12026–2026
MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PROCEEDING AGAINST McLENDON green
wash · 1993
2 sentences

2026Disciplinary Proceeding Against Haskell, 136 Wn.2d 300, 321 , 962 P.2d 813 (1998) (attorney’s unusual misconduct had been considered in only one, recent case); In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against McLendon, 120 Wn.2d 761, 773 , 845 P.2d 1006 (1993) (extraordinary mitigation due to “the existence of bipolar disorder during all relevant times . . . and . . . the abatement of symptoms and misconduct following proper diagnosis and treatment”); In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Malone, 107 Wn.2d 263, 265 , 728 P.2d 1029 (1986) (attorney “himself had brought the trust account discrepancies to t

2026Disciplinary Proceeding Against Haskell, 136 Wn.2d 300, 321 , 962 P.2d 813 (1998) (attorney’s unusual misconduct had been considered in only one, recent case); In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against McLendon, 120 Wn.2d 761, 773 , 845 P.2d 1006 (1993) (extraordinary mitigation due to “the existence of bipolar disorder during all relevant times . . . and . . . the abatement of symptoms and misconduct following proper diagnosis and treatment”); In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Malone, 107 Wn.2d 263, 265 , 728 P.2d 1029 (1986) (attorney “himself had brought the trust account discrepancies to t

12026–2026
State v. Peterson green
wash · 1968
2 sentences

1971State v. Peterson, 73 Wn.2d 303 , 438 P.2d 183 (1968).

1971State v. Peterson, 73 Wn.2d 303 , 438 P.2d 183 (1968).

11971–1971

Where else courts name it

TX 46 (1913–2023) MS 21 (1950–2017) CA 21 (1930–2026) NY 15 (1943–2025) PA 14 (1936–2018) ME 13 (2003–2024) OH 11 (1967–2024) IL 10 (1949–2023) MO 10 (1906–1993) WA 8 (1971–2026) AL 7 (1931–1994) NM 7 (1925–2023) FL 7 (1967–2015) CT 7 (1953–2018) GA 6 (1958–2023) MA 6 (1985–2012) OR 5 (1952–2017) NJ 5 (1926–2019) WI 4 (1887–2002) IN 4 (1979–2025) OK 4 (1915–1940) LA 4 (1983–1997) IA 4 (1934–2024) HI 3 (1994–2012) MD 3 (1990–1997) NE 3 (1942–1994) ND 3 (1998–2023) DC 2 (1983–2002) UT 2 (2001–2020) NH 2 (1977–1990) VA 2 (2006–2019) TN 2 (1970–2025) NC 2 (1942–1970) ID 2 (1980–1995) MN 2 (1950–1978) SC 2 (1933–1945) AK 2 (1979–1995) MI 2 (1987–1997) CO 2 (1994–2016) AR 2 (1956–1979)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check