Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ernest Dague, Sr., Ernest Dague, Jr., Betty Dague, and Rose A. Bessette v. City of Burlingtonred1 sentence1995We note that in the period between the Supreme Court’s decisions in Delaware Valley II and Dague some courts of appeals adopted Justice O’Connor’s concurring opinion as establishing the governing standard, see, e.g., Fadhl, supra, 859 F. 2d at 650 n. 1, whereas other circuit courts concluded that Delaware Valley II “provides no controlling legal holding.” King v. Palmer, 950 F.2d 771, 784 (D.C.Cir.1991), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3054 , 120 L.Ed.2d 920 (1992); Homeward Bound, Inc. v. Hissom Memorial Ctr., 963 F.2d 1352 , 1358 (10th Cir.1992); see also Dague, supra, 935 F.2d at 1360 (re | 1 | 1 |
Mabel A. King v. James F. Palmer, Director, D.C. Department of Corrections Mabel A. King v. James F. Palmer, Director, D.C. Department of Correctionsgreen1 sentence1995We note that in the period between the Supreme Court’s decisions in Delaware Valley II and Dague some courts of appeals adopted Justice O’Connor’s concurring opinion as establishing the governing standard, see, e.g., Fadhl, supra, 859 F. 2d at 650 n. 1, whereas other circuit courts concluded that Delaware Valley II “provides no controlling legal holding.” King v. Palmer, 950 F.2d 771, 784 (D.C.Cir.1991), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3054 , 120 L.Ed.2d 920 (1992); Homeward Bound, Inc. v. Hissom Memorial Ctr., 963 F.2d 1352 , 1358 (10th Cir.1992); see also Dague, supra, 935 F.2d at 1360 (re | 1 | 1 |
City of Burlington v. Daguegreen2 sentences1995We note that in the period between the Supreme Court’s decisions in Delaware Valley II and Dague some courts of appeals adopted Justice O’Connor’s concurring opinion as establishing the governing standard, see, e.g., Fadhl, supra, 859 F. 2d at 650 n. 1, whereas other circuit courts concluded that Delaware Valley II “provides no controlling legal holding.” King v. Palmer, 950 F.2d 771, 784 (D.C.Cir.1991), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3054 , 120 L.Ed.2d 920 (1992); Homeward Bound, Inc. v. Hissom Memorial Ctr., 963 F.2d 1352 , 1358 (10th Cir.1992); see also Dague, supra, 935 F.2d at 1360 (re 1995We note that in the period between the Supreme Court’s decisions in Delaware Valley II and Dague some courts of appeals adopted Justice O’Connor’s concurring opinion as establishing the governing standard, see, e.g., Fadhl, supra, 859 F. 2d at 650 n. 1, whereas other circuit courts concluded that Delaware Valley II “provides no controlling legal holding.” King v. Palmer, 950 F.2d 771, 784 (D.C.Cir.1991), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3054 , 120 L.Ed.2d 920 (1992); Homeward Bound, Inc. v. Hissom Memorial Ctr., 963 F.2d 1352 , 1358 (10th Cir.1992); see also Dague, supra, 935 F.2d at 1360 (re | 1 | 1 |
Thing v. La Chusagreen2 sentences1994Id. at 879-80, 771 P. 2d at 828 . 1994Id at 879-80, 771 P.2d at 828 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rendine v. Pantzer
green
2 sentences2012We observed that the “extraordinary volume of federal litigation on the question of contingency enhancements ... demonstrates the need for a clear rule, one that can readily and definitively be applied by trial courts, a rule that will end, not perpetuate, litigation of the issue.” Id. at 334 , 661 A.2d 1202 . 2012We observed that the “extraordinary volume of federal litigation on the question of contingency enhancements ... demonstrates the need for a clear rule, one that can readily and definitively be applied by trial courts, a rule that will end, not perpetuate, litigation of the issue.” Id. at 334 , 661 A.2d 1202 . | 2 | 2011–2012 |
Thornton v. United States
green
2 sentences2004Once an officer determines that there is probable cause to make an arrest, it is reasonable to allow officers to ensure their safety and to preserve evidence by searching the entire passenger compartment. [ Id. at ___, 124 S.Ct. at 2132 , 158 L.Ed. 2d at 914 .] Justices Scalia and Ginsburg, concurring, expressed what could only be charitably described as extreme reservations about the Belton rule. 2004Once an officer determines that there is probable cause to make an arrest, it is reasonable to allow officers to ensure their safety and to preserve evidence by searching the entire passenger compartment. [ Id. at ___, 124 S.Ct. at 2132 , 158 L.Ed. 2d at 914 .] Justices Scalia and Ginsburg, concurring, expressed what could only be charitably described as extreme reservations about the Belton rule. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Nancy FADHL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant-Appellant
green
2 sentences1995We note that in the period between the Supreme Court’s decisions in Delaware Valley II and Dague some courts of appeals adopted Justice O’Connor’s concurring opinion as establishing the governing standard, see, e.g., Fadhl, supra, 859 F. 2d at 650 n. 1, whereas other circuit courts concluded that Delaware Valley II “provides no controlling legal holding.” King v. Palmer, 950 F.2d 771, 784 (D.C.Cir.1991), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3054 , 120 L.Ed.2d 920 (1992); Homeward Bound, Inc. v. Hissom Memorial Ctr., 963 F.2d 1352 , 1358 (10th Cir.1992); see also Dague, supra, 935 F.2d at 1360 (re 1995We note that in the period between the Supreme Court’s decisions in Delaware Valley II and Dague some courts of appeals adopted Justice O’Connor’s concurring opinion as establishing the governing standard, see, e.g., Fadhl, supra, 859 F. 2d at 650 n. 1, whereas other circuit courts concluded that Delaware Valley II “provides no controlling legal holding.” King v. Palmer, 950 F.2d 771, 784 (D.C.Cir.1991), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3054 , 120 L.Ed.2d 920 (1992); Homeward Bound, Inc. v. Hissom Memorial Ctr., 963 F.2d 1352 , 1358 (10th Cir.1992); see also Dague, supra, 935 F.2d at 1360 (re | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Homeward Bound, Inc. v. Hissom Memorial Center
green
1 sentence1995We note that in the period between the Supreme Court’s decisions in Delaware Valley II and Dague some courts of appeals adopted Justice O’Connor’s concurring opinion as establishing the governing standard, see, e.g., Fadhl, supra, 859 F. 2d at 650 n. 1, whereas other circuit courts concluded that Delaware Valley II “provides no controlling legal holding.” King v. Palmer, 950 F.2d 771, 784 (D.C.Cir.1991), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3054 , 120 L.Ed.2d 920 (1992); Homeward Bound, Inc. v. Hissom Memorial Ctr., 963 F.2d 1352 , 1358 (10th Cir.1992); see also Dague, supra, 935 F.2d at 1360 (re | 1 | 1995–1995 |
King v. Ridley
green
1 sentence1995We note that in the period between the Supreme Court’s decisions in Delaware Valley II and Dague some courts of appeals adopted Justice O’Connor’s concurring opinion as establishing the governing standard, see, e.g., Fadhl, supra, 859 F. 2d at 650 n. 1, whereas other circuit courts concluded that Delaware Valley II “provides no controlling legal holding.” King v. Palmer, 950 F.2d 771, 784 (D.C.Cir.1991), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3054 , 120 L.Ed.2d 920 (1992); Homeward Bound, Inc. v. Hissom Memorial Ctr., 963 F.2d 1352 , 1358 (10th Cir.1992); see also Dague, supra, 935 F.2d at 1360 (re | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Hudson v. Washington
green
1 sentence1995We note that in the period between the Supreme Court’s decisions in Delaware Valley II and Dague some courts of appeals adopted Justice O’Connor’s concurring opinion as establishing the governing standard, see, e.g., Fadhl, supra, 859 F. 2d at 650 n. 1, whereas other circuit courts concluded that Delaware Valley II “provides no controlling legal holding.” King v. Palmer, 950 F.2d 771, 784 (D.C.Cir.1991), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3054 , 120 L.Ed.2d 920 (1992); Homeward Bound, Inc. v. Hissom Memorial Ctr., 963 F.2d 1352 , 1358 (10th Cir.1992); see also Dague, supra, 935 F.2d at 1360 (re | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.