third and fourth factors (New Jersey) · Go Syfert
← New Jersey issues

third and fourth factors in New Jersey

5 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Katherine L. Taylor v. Phoenixville School District green
ca3 · 1999
2 sentences

2019Dist. , 184 F.3d 296 , 319-20 (3d Cir. 1999).] While there were no disputes concerning the first and second factors, there were factual disputes as to the third and fourth factors.

2019Dist., 184 F.3d 296 , 319- 20 (3d Cir. 1999).] While there were no disputes concerning the first and second factors, there were factual disputes as to the third and fourth factors.

22019–2019
State v. Munroe green
nj · 2012
2 sentences

2017As to the third factor, defendant's guilty plea was entered pursuant to a negotiated agreement, although that is the factor that "receives the least weight in the overall analysis[.]" Munroe, supra, 210 N.J. at 443 .

2017As to the third factor, defendant's guilty plea was entered pursuant to a negotiated agreement, although that is the factor that "receives the least weight in the overall analysis[.]" Munroe, supra, 210 N.J. at 443 .

12017–2017
Lehmann v. Toys 'R' US, Inc. green
nj · 1993
2 sentences

2016To satisfy the third and fourth factors, a LAD plaintiff must show “that her working conditions were affected by the harassment to the point at which a reasonable woman would consider the working environment hostile.” Id. at 610, 626 A.2d 445 .

2016In this case, plaintiffs allege that the City should be liable because they were sexually harassed by a supervisor. 2 The Court recognized in Lehmann that an employer can be held liable for sexual harassment committed by a supervisor, consistent with the principles of agency law set forth in Restatement (Second) of Agency §§ 219(1)-(2) (hereinafter Restatement). 132 N.J. at 619-20 , 626 A.2d 445 .

12016–2016
In re the Commissioner of Insurance's Issuance of Orders A-92-189 & A-92-212 green
nj · 1994
1 sentence

2003The first two factors focus attention on whether the particular action was intended: (1) “to have wide coverage encompassing a large segment of the regulated or general public” and (2) “to be applied generally and uniformly to all similarly situated persons.” The third and fourth factors ask whether the action was (3) “designed to operate only in future eases ... prospectively” and (4) “prescribes a legal standard or directive that is not otherwise expressly provided by or clearly and obviously inferable from the enabling statutory authorization.” The fifth factor is phrased in the alternative

12003–2003
Metromedia, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation green
nj · 1984
1 sentence

2003The first two factors focus attention on whether the particular action was intended: (1) “to have wide coverage encompassing a large segment of the regulated or general public” and (2) “to be applied generally and uniformly to all similarly situated persons.” The third and fourth factors ask whether the action was (3) “designed to operate only in future eases ... prospectively” and (4) “prescribes a legal standard or directive that is not otherwise expressly provided by or clearly and obviously inferable from the enabling statutory authorization.” The fifth factor is phrased in the alternative

12003–2003

Where else courts name it

IL 23 (2000–2026) TX 21 (1989–2025) WI 9 (2002–2024) WA 8 (1995–2026) CA 7 (1980–2024) MI 7 (1996–2025) OH 6 (1999–2024) OR 5 (2015–2025) NM 5 (1999–2022) NJ 5 (2003–2019) MS 4 (1991–2005) LA 4 (1990–2018) GA 3 (2007–2010) VT 3 (2008–2025) MN 3 (2013–2016) CO 3 (2024–2026) KS 2 (1995–2020) NC 2 (2006–2012) MT 2 (2012–2012) PA 2 (2003–2019) WY 2 (2010–2018) MO 2 (2017–2025) AZ 2 (1985–2018) NY 2 (2015–2015) SC 2 (2020–2025) ND 2 (2018–2018) OK 2 (2017–2017)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check