Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Burnett, Unpublished Decision (3-11-2005)green1 sentence2024They are: (3) whether the accused was given a complete and impartial hearing on the motion; and (4) whether the record reveals that the court gave full and fair consideration to the plea withdrawal request. {¶53} “Inviting and hearing oral arguments on a motion to withdraw a guilty plea at the sentencing hearing can constitute a full and fair hearing on the motion.” State v. Greenleaf, 2006-Ohio-4317, ¶ 78 (11th Dist.), citing State v. Burnett, 2005-Ohio-1036, ¶ 20 (2d Dist.). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Greenleaf, Unpublished Decision (8-18-2006)green1 sentence2024They are: (3) whether the accused was given a complete and impartial hearing on the motion; and (4) whether the record reveals that the court gave full and fair consideration to the plea withdrawal request. {¶53} “Inviting and hearing oral arguments on a motion to withdraw a guilty plea at the sentencing hearing can constitute a full and fair hearing on the motion.” State v. Greenleaf, 2006-Ohio-4317, ¶ 78 (11th Dist.), citing State v. Burnett, 2005-Ohio-1036, ¶ 20 (2d Dist.). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wampler v. Higgins
green
2 sentences2011Wampler v. Higgins, 93 Ohio St.3d 111, 127 , 2001-Ohio-1293 , 752 N.E.2d 962 . 2011Wampler v. Higgins, 93 Ohio St.3d 111, 127 , 2001-Ohio-1293 , 752 N.E.2d 962 . | 2 | 2005–2011 |
State v. Barnes
green
1 sentence2024Discovery Received After Guilty Plea: {¶59} In State v. Barnes, 2022-Ohio-4486, ¶ 24 , the Ohio Supreme Court held that, without regard to considering any factors, a trial court may still abuse its discretion in denying a defendant’s presentence motion to withdraw a guilty plea. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
KLN Logistics Corp. v. Norton
green
2 sentences2021KLN Logistics Corp., 174 Ohio App.3d 712 , 2008-Ohio-212 , 884 N.E.2d 631, at ¶ 12 , citing Vanguard Transp. 2021KLN Logistics Corp., 174 Ohio App.3d 712 , 2008-Ohio-212 , 884 N.E.2d 631, at ¶ 12 , citing Vanguard Transp. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Wampler v. Higgins
green
1 sentence2011Wampler v. Higgins, 93 Ohio St.3d 111, 127 , 2001-Ohio-1293 , 752 N.E.2d 962 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Xie
green
1 sentence2001State v. Xie, supra, at 527 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Bertell Ollman v. Rowland Evans, Robert Novak
green
1 sentence1999This court has previously acknowledged that “[t]he language of the entire column may signal that a specific statement which, sitting alone, would appear to be factual is in actuality a statement of opinion.” Logan v. Fairfield (Oct. 26, 1989), Cuyahoga App. Nos. 56052 and 56055, unreported, 1989 WL 129119 , quoting Oilman v. Evans (D.C.Cir.1984), 750 F.2d 970 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.