Turner doctrine (Nevada) · Go Syfert
← Nevada issues

Turner doctrine in Nevada

5 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 1982–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Benejam v. Detroit Tigers, Incgreen
michctapp · 2001 · cited in 2 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014But, even assuming that this court was willing to extend the Turner doctrine to all recreational activities involving an inherent risk of injury, we cannot agree that any risk of injury inheres in the underlying activity Rodriguez engaged in here, namely attending a televised sporting event at a casino sports bar. "[M]any spectators prefer to sit where their view of the game is unobstructed by fences or protective netting and the proprietor of a ball park has a legitimate interest in catering to these desires." Benejam v. Detroit Tigers, Inc., 635 N.W.2d 219, 222-23 (Mich. Ct. App. 2001) (quot

2014But, even assuming that this court was willing to extend the Turner doctrine to all recreational activities involving an inherent risk of injury, we cannot agree that any risk of injury inheres in the underlying activity Rodriguez engaged in here, namely attending a televised sporting event at a casino sports bar. "[M]any spectators prefer to sit where their view of the game is unobstructed by fences or protective netting and the proprietor of a ball park has a legitimate interest in catering to these desires." Benejam v. Detroit Tigers, Inc., 635 N.W.2d 219, 222-23 (Mich. Ct. App. 2001) (quot

22
Butler v. Stategreen
nev · 2004 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
2 sentences

2020See, e.g., Butler v. State, 120 Nev. 879, 898, 102 P.3d 71, 84 (2004) (explaining that "[Wisparaging remarks directed toward defense counsel have absolutely no place in a courtroom, and clearly constitute misconduct," and that disparaging legitimate defense tactics is also misconduct (internal quotation marks omitted)).

2020See, e.g., Butler v. State, 120 Nev. 879, 898, 102 P.3d 71, 84 (2004) (explaining that "[Wisparaging remarks directed toward defense counsel have absolutely no place in a courtroom, and clearly constitute misconduct," and that disparaging legitimate defense tactics is also misconduct (internal quotation marks omitted)).

11
Turner v. Safleygreen
scotus · 1987 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014See id. at 90-91 .

2014See id. at 90-91 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Loughran v. the Phillies green
pasuperct · 2005
2 sentences

2014A stadium owner or operator cannot eliminate the risk errant balls might pose to spectators in such seating without fundamentally altering the game: a batter cannot predict the flight of a ball, so an owner or operator can only remove the risk that a struck ball might fly foul into uncovered seating by prohibiting all batting; and, the hope of retrieving a baseball as a souvenir has "become inextricably intertwined with a fan's baseball experience." Loughran, 888 A.2d at 876 .

2014A stadium owner or operator cannot eliminate the risk errant balls might pose to spectators in such seating without fundamentally altering the game: a batter cannot predict the flight of a ball, so an owner or operator can only remove the risk that a struck ball might fly foul into uncovered seating by prohibiting all batting; and, the hope of retrieving a baseball as a souvenir has "become inextricably intertwined with a fan's baseball experience." Loughran, 888 A.2d at 876 .

22014–2014
Beasley v. State green
nev · 1965
2 sentences

1982In Beasley v. State, 81 Nev. 431 , 404 P.2d 911 (1965), we determined that a party’s admission is relevant, and admissible, if at trial, it is inconsistent with the contention of the party who made the statement.

1982In Beasley v. State, 81 Nev. 431 , 404 P.2d 911 (1965), we determined that a party’s admission is relevant, and admissible, if at trial, it is inconsistent with the contention of the party who made the statement.

11982–1982

Where else courts name it

CA 27 (1948–2025) TX 26 (1923–2026) PA 23 (1966–2024) MI 18 (1976–2024) MS 18 (1991–2025) FL 15 (1982–2012) NY 14 (1994–2025) IN 14 (1980–2019) OH 13 (2000–2025) WA 13 (1999–2025) GA 12 (1998–2026) IL 12 (1977–2023) KS 10 (1986–2024) AK 8 (1998–2024) VA 8 (1977–2022) MA 8 (1988–2023) AL 8 (1985–2011) LA 6 (1969–2019) OR 6 (1987–2019) WI 6 (1996–2026) NV 5 (1982–2020) DC 5 (1982–2022) NJ 4 (1981–2007) KY 4 (1998–2026) ID 4 (1982–2020) NM 4 (2003–2026) MD 3 (1973–2012) MO 3 (2001–2016) NC 3 (1994–2013) AZ 3 (1993–2015) UT 3 (2004–2021) SC 3 (2012–2025) IA 3 (2014–2026) NE 2 (2016–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check