Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 New York opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2004 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Ryangreen2 sentences1997Finally, because the charges against defendant were committed prior to the legislative annulment of the principles espoused in People v Ryan ( 82 NY2d 497 ; see, L 1995, ch 75), the People were required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt not only that defendant was aware that he possessed cocaine, but also that its aggregate weight was at least four ounces (see, People v Ryan, supra, at 506). 1997Finally, because the charges against defendant were committed prior to the legislative annulment of the principles espoused in People v Ryan ( 82 NY2d 497 ; see, L 1995, ch 75), the People were required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt not only that defendant was aware that he possessed cocaine, but also that its aggregate weight was at least four ounces (see, People v Ryan, supra, at 506). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Davis
green
1 sentence2004The evidence at the Wade hearing established that the witness, an employee of Piercing Pagoda, had a significant amount of time to observe defendant and that their face-to-face interaction was sufficient to provide the witness with a basis independent of the showup identification to identify defendant in court as the man who used the stolen credit card (see People v Davis, 289 AD2d 977 [2001], lv denied 98 NY2d 636 [2002]). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
People v. Mike
green
1 sentence2001The evidence at the Wade hearing established that the witness knew defendant, and thus the showup identification was merely confirmatory (see, People v Mike, 283 AD2d 989 , Iv denied 96 NY2d 904 ). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
People v. Garcia
neutral
1 sentence2001It is therefore unnecessary to consider whether the passage of time between the crime and the showup identification, conceded to be excessive by the People, rendered the procedure unduly suggestive (see, People v Joseph, 244 AD2d 504, 504-505 , Iv denied 91 NY2d 893 ; People v Garcia, 216 AD2d 412 , Iv denied 86 NY2d 794 ). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
People v. Joseph
neutral
1 sentence2001It is therefore unnecessary to consider whether the passage of time between the crime and the showup identification, conceded to be excessive by the People, rendered the procedure unduly suggestive (see, People v Joseph, 244 AD2d 504, 504-505 , Iv denied 91 NY2d 893 ; People v Garcia, 216 AD2d 412 , Iv denied 86 NY2d 794 ). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
People v. Mosley
green
1 sentence1995Defendant’s guilt of the two robberies was established beyond a reasonable doubt based upon legally sufficient evidence proving his identity as the perpetrator of each crime (People v Mosley, 112 AD2d 812, affd 67 NY2d 985 ). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
People v. Mosley
green
1 sentence1995Defendant’s guilt of the two robberies was established beyond a reasonable doubt based upon legally sufficient evidence proving his identity as the perpetrator of each crime (People v Mosley, 112 AD2d 812, affd 67 NY2d 985 ). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
People v. Rodriguez
green
1 sentence1992We agree with defendant that the evidence at the Wade hearing was insufficient to show that the complainant’s precinct showup identification was confirmatory, based as it was on nothing more than the testimony of police officers that the complainant had informed them that he knew defendant from the neighborhood, and that a ruling based on evidence of specific knowledge was therefore required (People v Rodriguez, 79 NY2d 445 ). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
People v. Johnson
green
1 sentence1992However, in view of the overwhelming independent evidence of defendant’s guilt other than the in-court identification by the complainant, the court’s error was harmless (see, People v Johnson, 169 AD2d 779 , lv denied 77 NY2d 996 ). | 1 | 1992–1992 |