photographs hearing (New York) · Go Syfert
← New York issues

photographs hearing in New York

5 New York opinions name it 1 courts 1988–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Laniergreen
nyappdiv · 2015 · cited in 1 New York opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016In view of the overall strong similarity in the physical characteristics of the subjects depicted in the photographs and the instruction to witnesses to disregard features that could easily be changed, we find that defendant did not demonstrate a substantial likelihood that his picture would be singled out (see People v Lanier, 130 AD3d 1310, 1313 [2015], lv denied 26 NY3d 1009 [2015]; People v Matthews, 101 AD3d 1363 , 1364-1365 [2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 1101 [2013]).

11
People v. Bhuggogreen
nyappdiv · 1997 · cited in 1 New York opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
1 sentence

2003Given the type of photo identification, the People were able to meet their burden of going forward to establish the lack of suggestiveness without producing the photographs at the hearing (see People v Campos, 197 AD2d 366 [1993], lv denied 82 NY2d 892 [1993]; see also People v Bhuggo, 241 AD2d 301 [1997], lv denied 90 NY2d 938 [1997]).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Matthews green
nyappdiv · 2012
1 sentence

2016In view of the overall strong similarity in the physical characteristics of the subjects depicted in the photographs and the instruction to witnesses to disregard features that could easily be changed, we find that defendant did not demonstrate a substantial likelihood that his picture would be singled out (see People v Lanier, 130 AD3d 1310, 1313 [2015], lv denied 26 NY3d 1009 [2015]; People v Matthews, 101 AD3d 1363 , 1364-1365 [2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 1101 [2013]).

12016–2016
People v. Patterson green
nyappdiv · 2003
1 sentence

2010The People met their burden of going forward to establish the fairness of a computer-generated photo array even though they were unable to produce the photographs at the hearing (see People v Patterson, 306 AD2d 14 [2003], lv denied 1 NY3d 541 [2003]).

12010–2010
People v. Campos green
nyappdiv · 1993
1 sentence

2003Given the type of photo identification, the People were able to meet their burden of going forward to establish the lack of suggestiveness without producing the photographs at the hearing (see People v Campos, 197 AD2d 366 [1993], lv denied 82 NY2d 892 [1993]; see also People v Bhuggo, 241 AD2d 301 [1997], lv denied 90 NY2d 938 [1997]).

12003–2003
Bernacet v. Coughlin green
nyappdiv · 1988
1 sentence

1992This testimony, along with the photographs and test results, constituted substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see, Matter of Bernacet v Coughlin, 145 AD2d 802 , lv denied 74 NY2d 603 ).

11992–1992
People v. Davis green
ny · 1977
1 sentence

1988The determination whether evidence is relevant is entrusted to the discretion of the trial court (People v Davis, 43 NY2d 17, 27 , cert denied 435 US 998 ).

11988–1988
Davis v. New York green
scotus · 1978
1 sentence

1988The determination whether evidence is relevant is entrusted to the discretion of the trial court (People v Davis, 43 NY2d 17, 27 , cert denied 435 US 998 ).

11988–1988

Where else courts name it

TX 7 (1985–2006) NY 5 (1988–2016) NM 4 (1978–2023) MS 3 (1997–2024) TN 3 (1992–2012) KS 3 (1960–1994) AL 2 (1981–1981) SD 2 (2016–2016) WV 2 (1994–2023) MO 2 (1974–1988) AZ 2 (1983–2018) PA 2 (2017–2025) OK 2 (1965–2006) GA 2 (1989–1996) IL 2 (1990–1991) HI 2 (1980–2007)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check