Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 New York opinions name it 1 courts 1939–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dobbins v. Moss
neutral
2 sentences2014As a consequence, the plaintiffs failed to comply with their obligation to make an application to an institutional lender (see Dobbins v Moss, 305 AD2d 534 [2003]). 2014As a consequence, the plaintiffs failed to comply with their obligation to make an application to an institutional lender (see Dobbins v Moss, 305 AD2d 534 [2003]). | 2 | 2014–2014 |
Cooper v. Edinbergh
green
1 sentence1987The plaintiffs made no claim of prejudice in opposition to this branch of the appellant’s motion and we cannot say that the defense is clearly without merit (see, Fahey v County of Ontario, 44 NY2d 934 ; Norman v Ferrara, 107 AD2d 739 ; cf., Cooper v Edinbergh, 75 AD2d 757 ). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Neville v. McIntyre
green
1 sentence1987The plaintiffs made no claim of prejudice in opposition to this branch of the appellant’s motion and we cannot say that the defense is clearly without merit (see, Fahey v County of Ontario, 44 NY2d 934 ; Norman v Ferrara, 107 AD2d 739 ; cf., Cooper v Edinbergh, 75 AD2d 757 ). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Bichler v. Eli Lilly & Co.
green
1 sentence1986Even though the plaintiffs made a claim before Trial Term concerning the theory of concerted action among the defendant pharmaceutical companies, which claim was based upon the Bichler case ( 79 AD2d 317 , affd 55 NY2d 571 , supra) before us the plaintiffs have apparently abandoned that theory, since they do not make reference to it in their brief. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Bichler v. Eli Lilly & Co.
green
1 sentence1986Even though the plaintiffs made a claim before Trial Term concerning the theory of concerted action among the defendant pharmaceutical companies, which claim was based upon the Bichler case ( 79 AD2d 317 , affd 55 NY2d 571 , supra) before us the plaintiffs have apparently abandoned that theory, since they do not make reference to it in their brief. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Richard v. American Union Bank
green
1 sentence1939(See Richard v. American Union Bank, 253 N. Y. 166 .) The present action was started in 1938, fourteen or fifteen years after the contracts sued upon were made and after the alleged breaches, beginning in 1924, occurred. | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.