Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1967–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Feinberg v. Feinberggreen1 sentence2022See, e.g., Connecticut Podiatric Medical Assn. v. Health Net of Connecticut, Inc., 302 Conn. 464 , 475–76, 28 A.3d 958 (2011) (examining related statute to construe meaning of statutory term). 20 The trial court explained that the tower ‘‘consists of five sections: the top section, midsections A, B, [and] C, and a door section.’’ The trial court described the door section as the ‘‘enclosed interior of the base . . . [which] was designed to provide enough space for more than one individual to work therein, whether to monitor the computer systems and other equipment stored therein or [to] access | 1 | 1 |
Connecticut Podiatric Medical Ass'n v. Health Net of Connecticut, Inc.green1 sentence2022See, e.g., Connecticut Podiatric Medical Assn. v. Health Net of Connecticut, Inc., 302 Conn. 464 , 475–76, 28 A.3d 958 (2011) (examining related statute to construe meaning of statutory term). 20 The trial court explained that the tower ‘‘consists of five sections: the top section, midsections A, B, [and] C, and a door section.’’ The trial court described the door section as the ‘‘enclosed interior of the base . . . [which] was designed to provide enough space for more than one individual to work therein, whether to monitor the computer systems and other equipment stored therein or [to] access | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Windsor Hall Rest Home, Inc. v. Commission on Hospitals & Health Care
green
1 sentence2004In Fuller , “the plaintiffs made a claim of appeal, which was accepted by the Probate Court, within thirty days of the decree appealed from, but neither posted an appeal bond nor actually obtained allowance of the appeal from the court within thirty days. [Our Supreme Court], in affirming the trial court’s sustaining of the defendant’s plea in abatement, held that, as the appeal was not allowed within thirty days, it could not be resurrected by the late filing of the appeals bond.” (Emphasis in original.) Kron v. Thelen, 178 Conn. 189, 195-96 , 423 A.2d 857 (1979). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Kron v. Thelen
green
1 sentence2004In Fuller , “the plaintiffs made a claim of appeal, which was accepted by the Probate Court, within thirty days of the decree appealed from, but neither posted an appeal bond nor actually obtained allowance of the appeal from the court within thirty days. [Our Supreme Court], in affirming the trial court’s sustaining of the defendant’s plea in abatement, held that, as the appeal was not allowed within thirty days, it could not be resurrected by the late filing of the appeals bond.” (Emphasis in original.) Kron v. Thelen, 178 Conn. 189, 195-96 , 423 A.2d 857 (1979). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Filisko v. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co.
green
1 sentence1992Citing the decisions of our Supreme Court in Filisko v. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co., 176 Conn. 33 , 34 (1978), the defendant maintains that the four elements which the plaintiffs were required to prove, in order to establish the existence of a private nuisance on defendant's property, were not established by the evidence adduced by the plaintiffs. 6) It is regrettable that one, Barton, the defendant's tenant at 143 First Avenue during most of the time when cars were claimed to be parked in front of his rented portion of the defendant's premises, was not made a party defendant in this case. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Gesswin v. Beckwith
red
1 sentence1992C — CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Based on a detailed examination of the evidence adduced, and the exhibits, including the numerous photographs of the scene, and weighing the testimony of the parties themselves, the undersigned reaches the following conclusions and enters the orders set out hereinafter. 1) Although the plaintiffs made claim in Par. 11 of their complaint that the defendant created a private nuisance affecting CT Page 4029 pedestrians, this allegation is not found proven and is, therefore, denied. 2) The legal definition of a condition, relative to the ownership of real property, which can | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Fuller v. Marvin
green
2 sentences1979Finally, in Fuller v. Marvin, 107 Conn. 354 , 140 A. 731 (1928), the plaintiffs made a claim. of appeal, which was accepted by the Probate Court, within thirty days of the decree appealed from, but *196 neither posted an appeal bond nor actually obtained allowance of the appeal from the court within thirty days. 1979Finally, in Fuller v. Marvin, 107 Conn. 354 , 140 A. 731 (1928), the plaintiffs made a claim. of appeal, which was accepted by the Probate Court, within thirty days of the decree appealed from, but *196 neither posted an appeal bond nor actually obtained allowance of the appeal from the court within thirty days. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. Thatcher
green
1 sentence1967Zygmont v. Planning Zoning Commission, 152 Conn. 550 , 555 ; Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. Thatcher, 278 N.Y. 222 ; 2 Metzenbaum, Zoning, pp. 1451-1665. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Zygmont v. Planning & Zoning Commission
green
1 sentence1967Zygmont v. Planning Zoning Commission, 152 Conn. 550 , 555 ; Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. Thatcher, 278 N.Y. 222 ; 2 Metzenbaum, Zoning, pp. 1451-1665. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.