Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2006–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re Burtongreen2 sentences2023To the extent appellant asserts the evidence at trial was insufficient because it relied on allegations of appellant's past behavior, we note that the Burton factors related to an individual's current substantial risk and present mental and physical condition "must be evaluated 'upon current or recent behavior as well as prior dangerous propensities of the person' and that the trial court is afforded broad discretion 'to review this individual's past history in order to make a well-informed determination of his present mental condition.' " (Emphasis omitted.) J.L.S. at ¶ 35, quoting Burton at 2023To the extent appellant asserts the evidence at trial was insufficient because it relied on allegations of appellant's past behavior, we note that the Burton factors related to an individual's current substantial risk and present mental and physical condition "must be evaluated 'upon current or recent behavior as well as prior dangerous propensities of the person' and that the trial court is afforded broad discretion 'to review this individual's past history in order to make a well-informed determination of his present mental condition.' " (Emphasis omitted.) J.L.S. at ¶ 35, quoting Burton at | 1 | 2 |
Lafler v. Coopergreen2 sentences2014See Lafler v. Cooper, ___ U.S. ___, 132 S.Ct. 1376, 1385 , 182 L.Ed.2d 398 (2012). 1 {¶4} The evidentiary basis for Burton’s claim that defense counsel failed to inform him of inculpatory evidence is slim. 2014See Lafler v. Cooper, ___ U.S. ___, 132 S.Ct. 1376, 1385 , 182 L.Ed.2d 398 (2012). 1 {¶4} The evidentiary basis for Burton’s claim that defense counsel failed to inform him of inculpatory evidence is slim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Allison, Unpublished Decision (2-22-2007)
neutral
1 sentence2014State v. Allison, 2007 Ohio 789 .” {¶ 7} On September 30, 2008, Burton, this time represented by counsel, again filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Fanning
green
1 sentence2006State v. Fanning (1982), 1 Ohio St.3d 19 , 20 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.