Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 1989–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Awangreen2 sentences2005See, e.g., In re Harmon (Sept. 24, 2000), Scioto App. No. 00CA2693, quoting State v. Awan (1986), 22 Ohio St.3d 120 , 123 , 489 N.E.2d 277 ("`The choice between credible witnesses and their conflicting testimony rests solely with the finder of fact and an appellate court may not substitute its judgment for that of the trier of fact.'"). {¶ 33} Her argument that the court failed to consider the primary caretaker doctrine also is meritless. 2005See, e.g., In re Harmon (Sept. 24, 2000), Scioto App. No. 00CA2693, quoting State v. Awan (1986), 22 Ohio St.3d 120 , 123 , 489 N.E.2d 277 ("`The choice between credible witnesses and their conflicting testimony rests solely with the finder of fact and an appellate court may not substitute its judgment for that of the trier of fact.'"). {¶ 33} Her argument that the court failed to consider the primary caretaker doctrine also is meritless. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Thompson v. Thompson
green
2 sentences2000Roth , 65 Ohio App. 3d at 773 , 585 N.E.2d at 485 , citing Thompson v. Thompson (1987), 31 Ohio App.3d 254 , 255-257 , 511 N.E.2d 412 , 413-415 . 2000Roth , 65 Ohio App. 3d at 773 , 585 N.E.2d at 485 , citing Thompson v. Thompson (1987), 31 Ohio App.3d 254 , 255-257 , 511 N.E.2d 412 , 413-415 . | 3 | 1989–2000 |
Holm v. Smilowitz
green
2 sentences2000Holm , 83 Ohio App.3d at 776 , 615 N.E.2d at 1059 . 2000Holm , 83 Ohio App.3d at 776 , 615 N.E.2d at 1059 . | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Cady v. Dombrowski
green
1 sentence2001Cady v. Dumbrowski (1973), 413 U.S. 433 , 441 . 5 Appellant stipulated to the existence of probable cause to arrest. 6 We note that appellant argues that the Sergeant had no reasonable, articulable suspicion based upon the Sergeant's testimony that he had not observed appellant commit an unlawful act nor had any indication that appellant had broken any laws. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Williams
green
1 sentence2001State v. Haberman (June 2, 2000), Fairfield App. No. 99CA0068, unreported, 2000 WL 873521 (citing State v. Williams (1990), 51 Ohio St.3d 58 ). 4 The caretaker exception, as defined by appellant, involves a law enforcement officer's investigation of an accident which does not include the detection, investigation or acquisition of evidence relating to a criminal statute. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Roth v. Roth
green
2 sentences2000Roth , 65 Ohio App. 3d at 773 , 585 N.E.2d at 485 , citing Thompson v. Thompson (1987), 31 Ohio App.3d 254 , 255-257 , 511 N.E.2d 412 , 413-415 . 2000Roth , 65 Ohio App. 3d at 773 , 585 N.E.2d at 485 , citing Thompson v. Thompson (1987), 31 Ohio App.3d 254 , 255-257 , 511 N.E.2d 412 , 413-415 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.