Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Joseph Ferrell v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Correctionsgreen1 sentence1992See People v. Branson (1984), 131 Ill.App.3d 280, 287 , 86 Ill.Dec. 526, 532 , 475 N.E.2d 905, 911 ; Ferrell v. Estelle (C.A.5, 1978), 568 F.2d 1128, 1131-1133 (opinion withdrawn as moot due to the prisoner’s death, 573 F.2d 867 ). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Bransongreen2 sentences1992See People v. Branson (1984), 131 Ill.App.3d 280, 287 , 86 Ill.Dec. 526, 532 , 475 N.E.2d 905, 911 ; Ferrell v. Estelle (C.A.5, 1978), 568 F.2d 1128, 1131-1133 (opinion withdrawn as moot due to the prisoner’s death, 573 F.2d 867 ). 1992See People v. Branson (1984), 131 Ill.App.3d 280, 287 , 86 Ill.Dec. 526, 532 , 475 N.E.2d 905, 911 ; Ferrell v. Estelle (C.A.5, 1978), 568 F.2d 1128, 1131-1133 (opinion withdrawn as moot due to the prisoner’s death, 573 F.2d 867 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Schaim
green
2 sentences2021In so doing, the Supreme Court concluded that, “[t]he Sixth Amendment requires a trial court to grant an evidentiary hearing when a defendant makes a credible claim that he or she is seriously hearing-impaired.” Id. 2014Accordingly, the Court construed the Sixth Amendment to require “a trial court to grant an evidentiary hearing when a defendant makes a credible claim that he or she is seriously hearing-impaired.” Id. at 64-65 . | 3 | 2002–2021 |
People v. Rivera
green
1 sentence2004Id. {¶ 9} In the case sub judice, the record indicates that appellant had with him at trial a hearing aid device. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Joseph Ferrell v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections
green
1 sentence1992See People v. Branson (1984), 131 Ill.App.3d 280, 287 , 86 Ill.Dec. 526, 532 , 475 N.E.2d 905, 911 ; Ferrell v. Estelle (C.A.5, 1978), 568 F.2d 1128, 1131-1133 (opinion withdrawn as moot due to the prisoner’s death, 573 F.2d 867 ). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.