5 Oklahoma opinions name it 1 courts 2000–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Warner v. Stategreen2 sentences2017Warner, 2006 OK CR 40, ¶ 207, 144 P.3d at 893. 2017Warner, 2006 OK CR 40, ¶ 207, 144 P.3d at 893. | 1 | 2 |
NEWMAN v. STATEgreen2 sentences2021When the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged on appeal, we review the trial "evidence in the light most favorable to the State and will not disturb the verdict if any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt." Newman v. State, 2020 OK CR 14, ¶ 8, 466 P.3d 574, 580. ¶16 A.M.C. argues that the only evidence supporting the claim that he was in possession of a firearm was his confession, which should have been suppressed. 2021When the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged on appeal, we review the trial "evidence in the light most favorable to the State and will not disturb the verdict if any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt." Newman v. State, 2020 OK CR 14, ¶ 8, 466 P.3d 574, 580. ¶16 A.M.C. argues that the only evidence supporting the claim that he was in possession of a firearm was his confession, which should have been suppressed. | 1 | 1 |
Indian Country v. State of Oklahomagreen1 sentence2005See id. at 975 n. 3, 980 n. 5. ¶ 52 If the federal courts remain undecided on this particular issue, we refuse to step in and make such a finding here. ¶ 53 Regarding the issue of dependent Indian communities, the evidence supporting that claim is thin, especially in regard to the issue of dependency. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Taylor v. State
green
2 sentences2000Taylor v. State, 1998 OK CR 64 , 972 P.2d 864 . 2000Taylor v. State, 1998 OK CR 64 , 972 P.2d 864 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.