10 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1998–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Joyner v. Stategreen2 sentences2016Gonzales does cite to Joyner v. State, 678 N.E.2d 386, 390 (Ind. 1997) for the proposition that it is error to “categorically exclude the defendant’s evidence supporting [a] defense that the murder was committed by another person.” However, at issue in Joyner was the relevance of the evidence supporting the defense that the crime was committed by another person. 2016See id. at 390 .3 The Joyner court did not address the admissibility of hearsay evidence at all, as the evidence implicating another individual in that case was not hearsay. [27] Instead, we agree with the State that this case is more akin to Lashbrook v. State, 762 N.E.2d 756 (Ind. 2002). | 1 | 1 |
Lashbrook v. Stategreen1 sentence2016See id. at 390 .3 The Joyner court did not address the admissibility of hearsay evidence at all, as the evidence implicating another individual in that case was not hearsay. [27] Instead, we agree with the State that this case is more akin to Lashbrook v. State, 762 N.E.2d 756 (Ind. 2002). | 1 | 1 |
Norrington v. Smithgreen2 sentences1998See Norrington v. Smith, 154 Ind.App. 413, 418 , 290 N.E.2d 60, 63 (1972) (holding that the evidence now alleged to have been incompetent was nonetheless properly admitted without timely objection and properly before the jury); St. 1998See Norrington v. Smith, 154 Ind.App. 413, 418 , 290 N.E.2d 60, 63 (1972) (holding that the evidence now alleged to have been incompetent was nonetheless properly admitted without timely objection and properly before the jury); St. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Howard v. State
green
2 sentences2015Id. 2010The evidence must have some probative value to support the defense." Id. | 3 | 2007–2015 |
Dayhuff v. State
green
2 sentences2002Id. 1998Acknowledging that the evidence supporting the giving of the instruction was “weak”, id. at 1102 , we nevertheless held that the trial court erred in refusing to give the instruction. | 2 | 1998–2002 |
Springer v. State
green
1 sentence2012Id. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Green River Motel Management of Dale, LLC v. State
green
1 sentence2012Id. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Gooch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
green
2 sentences2004Id. 2004Id. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.