evidence supporting instruction (Kansas) · Go Syfert
← Kansas issues

evidence supporting instruction in Kansas

9 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2022 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Hillgreen
kan · 1987 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
1 sentence

1996See Hill, 242 Kan. 68 , Syl. ¶ 2.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (12)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Haygood green
kan · 2018
1 sentence

2022State v. Haygood, 308 Kan. 1387 , 1403, 430 P.3d 11 (2018).

12022–2022
State v. Ward green
kan · 2011
2 sentences

2022When an appellant presents an instructional challenge, this court engages in a four-step analysis in which it must: (1) assess whether the issue was properly preserved, exercising an unlimited standard of review; (2) determine whether the instruction was legally appropriate; (3) determine whether the instruction was factually appropriate, reviewing the evidence supporting such an instruction in the light most favorable to the appellant; and finally (4) if the district court erred, whether such error was harmless under State v. Ward, 292 Kan. 541, 565 , 256 P.3d 801 (2011).

2022When an appellant presents an instructional challenge, this court engages in a four-step analysis in which it must: (1) assess whether the issue was properly preserved, exercising an unlimited standard of review; (2) determine whether the instruction was legally appropriate; (3) determine whether the instruction was factually appropriate, reviewing the evidence supporting such an instruction in the light most favorable to the appellant; and finally (4) if the district court erred, whether such error was harmless under State v. Ward, 292 Kan. 541, 565 , 256 P.3d 801 (2011).

12022–2022
State v. Collins green
kanctapp · 2006
1 sentence

2021The Collins court reasoned and held that Collins was entitled to an instruction on his theory of the case, even if the evidence supporting his defense was slight. 36 Kan.

12021–2021
State v. Fisher green
kan · 2016
1 sentence

2017Fisher, 304 Kan. at 256-57 .

12017–2017
State v. Sperry green
kan · 1999
2 sentences

2016Then, in State v. Sperry, 267 Kan. 287 , 978 P.2d 933 (1999), this court was again confronted with a self-defense instruction given without the clarifying 52.08 PIK instruction.

2016Then, in State v. Sperry, 267 Kan. 287 , 978 P.2d 933 (1999), this court was again confronted with a self-defense instruction given without the clarifying 52.08 PIK instruction.

12016–2016
State v. Crabtree green
kan · 1991
1 sentence

2016The court then added that the evidence supporting the defense was vanishingly weak and that consideration of the evidence, combined with the accuracy of the *965 instructions as a whole, did not lead to reversible error. 248 Kan. at 40-41 .

12016–2016
In Re JL green
kanctapp · 1995
1 sentence

2006Next, T.M. argues that the trial court erred in ruling that there was a presumption of unfitness when the trial court failed to determine whether the evidence supporting the presumption was a K.S.A. 60-414(a) or 60-414(b) presumption based on the rule in In re J.L., 20 Kan.

12006–2006
In the Interest of J.L. green
kanctapp · 1995
1 sentence

2006App. 2d 665 , 891 P.2d 1125 , rev. denied 257 Kan. 1092 (1995).

12006–2006
State v. Brown green
kan · 1995
2 sentences

1996State v. Brown, 258 Kan. 374, 386 , 904 P.2d 985 (1995); State v. Hunter, 241 Kan. 629, 646 , 740 P.2d 559 (1987).

1996State v. Brown, 258 Kan. 374, 386 , 904 P.2d 985 (1995); State v. Hunter, 241 Kan. 629, 646 , 740 P.2d 559 (1987).

11996–1996
State v. Hunter green
kan · 1987
2 sentences

1996State v. Brown, 258 Kan. 374, 386 , 904 P.2d 985 (1995); State v. Hunter, 241 Kan. 629, 646 , 740 P.2d 559 (1987).

1996State v. Brown, 258 Kan. 374, 386 , 904 P.2d 985 (1995); State v. Hunter, 241 Kan. 629, 646 , 740 P.2d 559 (1987).

11996–1996
State v. Cummings green
kan · 1987
1 sentence

1991The test is whether the evidence might reasonably cause a jury to convict the defendant of the lesser charge. 242 Kan. at 91 .

11991–1991
State v. Royal green
kan · 1983
2 sentences

1987State v. Royal, 234 Kan. 218, 221-22 , 670 P.2d 1337 (1983).

1987State v. Royal, 234 Kan. 218, 221-22 , 670 P.2d 1337 (1983).

11987–1987

Where else courts name it

TX 101 (1972–2026) CA 92 (1963–2026) GA 26 (1957–2024) IL 24 (2000–2025) FL 16 (1985–2016) DC 12 (1979–2017) MO 11 (1959–2022) OH 11 (1990–2025) NY 10 (1899–2021) IN 10 (1998–2016) MS 9 (1986–2014) KS 9 (1987–2022) OR 8 (2005–2018) IA 8 (1991–2017) MI 7 (1971–2024) WA 7 (2018–2025) MA 7 (1982–2018) NJ 5 (1979–2019) OK 5 (2000–2021) PA 4 (2017–2025) ME 4 (1984–2025) LA 4 (1971–2015) CT 4 (2000–2015) NM 3 (1993–2025) AL 3 (1926–2024) UT 3 (2012–2023) VA 3 (2005–2024) VT 2 (2014–2025) MD 2 (1978–2010) NC 2 (2014–2024) ID 2 (2004–2008) CO 2 (2024–2025) AR 2 (1948–1989) KY 2 (2010–2025) RI 2 (1995–2008) DE 2 (1988–2021) MN 2 (1954–2026) AK 2 (2018–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check