Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Oklahoma opinions name it 1 courts 1994–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Davis v. Stategreen2 sentences2016Davis v. State , 2011 OK CR 29, ¶ 101 , 268 P.3d 86, 115 ( citing Shrum v. State , 1999 OK CR 41, ¶ 7 , 991 P.2d 1032, 1035 ). 2016Davis v. State , 2011 OK CR 29, ¶ 101 , 268 P.3d 86, 115 ( citing Shrum v. State , 1999 OK CR 41, ¶ 7 , 991 P.2d 1032, 1035 ). | 2 | 2 |
Seabolt v. Stategreen2 sentences2016King v. State , 2008 OK CR 13, ¶ 4 , 182 P.3d 842, 843 ; Seabolt v. State , 2006 OK CR 50, ¶ 15 , 152 P.3d 235, 241 (Lumpkin, V.P.J., Dissenting). ¶4 Whether any particular offense is a lesser included offense depends upon which lesser included offense test or approach is utilized and whether the trial evidence warrants the instruction. 2016King v. State , 2008 OK CR 13, ¶ 4 , 182 P.3d 842, 843 ; Seabolt v. State , 2006 OK CR 50, ¶ 15 , 152 P.3d 235, 241 (Lumpkin, V.P.J., Dissenting). ¶4 Whether any particular offense is a lesser included offense depends upon which lesser included offense test or approach is utilized and whether the trial evidence warrants the instruction. | 2 | 2 |
Shrum v. Stategreen2 sentences2016Davis v. State , 2011 OK CR 29, ¶ 101 , 268 P.3d 86, 115 ( citing Shrum v. State , 1999 OK CR 41, ¶ 7 , 991 P.2d 1032, 1035 ). 2016Davis v. State , 2011 OK CR 29, ¶ 101 , 268 P.3d 86, 115 ( citing Shrum v. State , 1999 OK CR 41, ¶ 7 , 991 P.2d 1032, 1035 ). | 1 | 3 |
King v. Stategreen2 sentences2016King v. State , 2008 OK CR 13, ¶ 4 , 182 P.3d 842, 843 ; Seabolt v. State , 2006 OK CR 50, ¶ 15 , 152 P.3d 235, 241 (Lumpkin, V.P.J., Dissenting). ¶4 Whether any particular offense is a lesser included offense depends upon which lesser included offense test or approach is utilized and whether the trial evidence warrants the instruction. 2016King v. State , 2008 OK CR 13, ¶ 4 , 182 P.3d 842, 843 ; Seabolt v. State , 2006 OK CR 50, ¶ 15 , 152 P.3d 235, 241 (Lumpkin, V.P.J., Dissenting). ¶4 Whether any particular offense is a lesser included offense depends upon which lesser included offense test or approach is utilized and whether the trial evidence warrants the instruction. | 1 | 2 |
REYNOLDS v. STATEgreen2 sentences2024Reynolds v. State , 2022 OK CR 14, ¶ 15 , 516 P.3d 249 , 255. 2024Reynolds v. State , 2022 OK CR 14, ¶ 15, 516 P.3d 249, 255. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Spaziano v. Florida
red
2 sentences1994We find Spaziano v. Florida, 468 U.S. 447, 455 , 104 S.Ct. 3154, 3159 , 82 L.Ed.2d 340 (1984) dispositive. 1994We find Spaziano v. Florida, 468 U.S. 447, 455 , 104 S.Ct. 3154, 3159 , 82 L.Ed.2d 340 (1984) dispositive. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.