Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Oklahoma opinions name it 2 courts 2015–2023 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Staley v. Harris Countygreen2 sentences2015Pa. 2013) (denying school's motion to dismiss because plaintiffs stated a facially plausible claim that a Ten Commandments monument in front of a high school that had been in place for decades violated the Establishment Clause); ACLU of Ohio Found., Inc. v. DeWeese , 633 F.3d 424 (6th Cir. 2011) (holding that poster hung in courtroom in 2006 including the Ten Commandments and stating that law is based upon morality violated the Establishment Clause and was not protected religious speech); Stanley v. Harris Cnty., Texas , 461 F.3d 504, 509-515 (5th Cir. 2006) (holding that a monument in place s 2015Dist., 919 F.Supp.2d 648 (W.D.Pa.2013) (denying school's motion to dismiss because plaintiffs stated a facially plausible claim that a Ten Commandments monument in front of a high school that had been in place for decades violated the Establishment Clause) ACLU of Ohio Found., Inc. v. DeWeese, 633 F.3d 424 (6th Cir.2011) (holding that poster hung in courtroom in 2006 including the Ten Commandments and stating that law is based upon morality violated the Establishment Clause and was not protected religious speech); Staley v. Harris Cnty., Texas, 461 F.3d 504, 509-515 (5th Cir.2006) (holding tha | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wigod v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
green
2 sentences2023The court also found the borrower stated, on facts quite similar to those in this case, "a facially plausible claim of promissory estoppel." Id. 2023The court also found the borrower stated, on facts quite similar to those in this case, "a facially plausible claim of promissory estoppel." Id. | 3 | 2023–2023 |
American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio Foundation, Inc. v. DeWeese
green
2 sentences2015Pa. 2013) (denying school's motion to dismiss because plaintiffs stated a facially plausible claim that a Ten Commandments monument in front of a high school that had been in place for decades violated the Establishment Clause); ACLU of Ohio Found., Inc. v. DeWeese , 633 F.3d 424 (6th Cir. 2011) (holding that poster hung in courtroom in 2006 including the Ten Commandments and stating that law is based upon morality violated the Establishment Clause and was not protected religious speech); Stanley v. Harris Cnty., Texas , 461 F.3d 504, 509-515 (5th Cir. 2006) (holding that a monument in place s 2015Dist., 919 F.Supp.2d 648 (W.D.Pa.2013) (denying school's motion to dismiss because plaintiffs stated a facially plausible claim that a Ten Commandments monument in front of a high school that had been in place for decades violated the Establishment Clause) ACLU of Ohio Found., Inc. v. DeWeese, 633 F.3d 424 (6th Cir.2011) (holding that poster hung in courtroom in 2006 including the Ten Commandments and stating that law is based upon morality violated the Establishment Clause and was not protected religious speech); Staley v. Harris Cnty., Texas, 461 F.3d 504, 509-515 (5th Cir.2006) (holding tha | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Adland v. Russ
green
2 sentences2015Civil Liberties Union of Ohio Found., Inc. v. Ashbrook , 375 F.3d 484 (6th Cir. 2004) (striking down a Ten Commandments display hung in a county courtroom in 2000); Glassroth v. Moore , 335 F.3d 1282 (11th Cir. 2003) (striking down Ten Commandments monument placed in the rotunda of the Alabama State Judicial Building in 2001); Adland v. Russ , 307 F.3d 471 (6th Cir. 2002) (striking down Ten Commandments monument donated by Fraternal Order of Eagles in 1971, which had been removed in 1980 and put in storage, but which the Kentucky Legislature attempted to reinstall on capitol grounds in 2000); 2015Civil Liberties Union of Ohio Found., Inc. v. Ashbrook, 375 F.3d 484 (6th Cir.2004) (striking down a Ten Commandments display hung in a county courtroom in 2000); Glassroth v. Moore, 335 F.3d 1282 (11th Cir.2003) (striking down Ten Commandments monument placed in the rotunda of the Alabama State Judicial Building in 2001); Adland v. Russ, 307 F.3d 471 (6th Cir.2002) (striking down Ten Commandments monument donated by Fraternal Order of Eagles in 1971, which had been removed in 1980 and put in storage, but which the Kentucky Legislature attempted to reinstall on capitol grounds in 2000); Am. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
American Civil Liberties Union Of Ohio Foundation, Inc. v. Robert Ashbrook
green
2 sentences2015Civil Liberties Union of Ohio Found., Inc. v. Ashbrook , 375 F.3d 484 (6th Cir. 2004) (striking down a Ten Commandments display hung in a county courtroom in 2000); Glassroth v. Moore , 335 F.3d 1282 (11th Cir. 2003) (striking down Ten Commandments monument placed in the rotunda of the Alabama State Judicial Building in 2001); Adland v. Russ , 307 F.3d 471 (6th Cir. 2002) (striking down Ten Commandments monument donated by Fraternal Order of Eagles in 1971, which had been removed in 1980 and put in storage, but which the Kentucky Legislature attempted to reinstall on capitol grounds in 2000); 2015Civil Liberties Union of Ohio Found., Inc. v. Ashbrook, 375 F.3d 484 (6th Cir.2004) (striking down a Ten Commandments display hung in a county courtroom in 2000); Glassroth v. Moore, 335 F.3d 1282 (11th Cir.2003) (striking down Ten Commandments monument placed in the rotunda of the Alabama State Judicial Building in 2001); Adland v. Russ, 307 F.3d 471 (6th Cir.2002) (striking down Ten Commandments monument donated by Fraternal Order of Eagles in 1971, which had been removed in 1980 and put in storage, but which the Kentucky Legislature attempted to reinstall on capitol grounds in 2000); Am. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Glassroth v. Moore
green
2 sentences2015Civil Liberties Union of Ohio Found., Inc. v. Ashbrook , 375 F.3d 484 (6th Cir. 2004) (striking down a Ten Commandments display hung in a county courtroom in 2000); Glassroth v. Moore , 335 F.3d 1282 (11th Cir. 2003) (striking down Ten Commandments monument placed in the rotunda of the Alabama State Judicial Building in 2001); Adland v. Russ , 307 F.3d 471 (6th Cir. 2002) (striking down Ten Commandments monument donated by Fraternal Order of Eagles in 1971, which had been removed in 1980 and put in storage, but which the Kentucky Legislature attempted to reinstall on capitol grounds in 2000); 2015Civil Liberties Union of Ohio Found., Inc. v. Ashbrook, 375 F.3d 484 (6th Cir.2004) (striking down a Ten Commandments display hung in a county courtroom in 2000); Glassroth v. Moore, 335 F.3d 1282 (11th Cir.2003) (striking down Ten Commandments monument placed in the rotunda of the Alabama State Judicial Building in 2001); Adland v. Russ, 307 F.3d 471 (6th Cir.2002) (striking down Ten Commandments monument donated by Fraternal Order of Eagles in 1971, which had been removed in 1980 and put in storage, but which the Kentucky Legislature attempted to reinstall on capitol grounds in 2000); Am. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Staley v. Harris County TX
green
2 sentences2015Pa. 2013) (denying school's motion to dismiss because plaintiffs stated a facially plausible claim that a Ten Commandments monument in front of a high school that had been in place for decades violated the Establishment Clause); ACLU of Ohio Found., Inc. v. DeWeese , 633 F.3d 424 (6th Cir. 2011) (holding that poster hung in courtroom in 2006 including the Ten Commandments and stating that law is based upon morality violated the Establishment Clause and was not protected religious speech); Stanley v. Harris Cnty., Texas , 461 F.3d 504, 509-515 (5th Cir. 2006) (holding that a monument in place s 2015Dist., 919 F.Supp.2d 648 (W.D.Pa.2013) (denying school's motion to dismiss because plaintiffs stated a facially plausible claim that a Ten Commandments monument in front of a high school that had been in place for decades violated the Establishment Clause) ACLU of Ohio Found., Inc. v. DeWeese, 633 F.3d 424 (6th Cir.2011) (holding that poster hung in courtroom in 2006 including the Ten Commandments and stating that law is based upon morality violated the Establishment Clause and was not protected religious speech); Staley v. Harris Cnty., Texas, 461 F.3d 504, 509-515 (5th Cir.2006) (holding tha | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Freedom from Religion Foundation, Inc. v. New Kensington-Arnold School District
neutral
1 sentence2015Dist., 919 F.Supp.2d 648 (W.D.Pa.2013) (denying school's motion to dismiss because plaintiffs stated a facially plausible claim that a Ten Commandments monument in front of a high school that had been in place for decades violated the Establishment Clause) ACLU of Ohio Found., Inc. v. DeWeese, 633 F.3d 424 (6th Cir.2011) (holding that poster hung in courtroom in 2006 including the Ten Commandments and stating that law is based upon morality violated the Establishment Clause and was not protected religious speech); Staley v. Harris Cnty., Texas, 461 F.3d 504, 509-515 (5th Cir.2006) (holding tha | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.