Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
39 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Robinson v. Stategreen2 sentences2014See Robinson v. State, 693 N.E.2d 548, 552 (Ind. 1998). 2001Although the language in both is "the failure to request an admonishment or move for a mistrial results in waiver of the issue," Robinson, 693 N.E.2d at 552 ; Brown, 572 N.E.2d at 498 , in both cases, the defendants not only failed to seek an admonishment but also failed to move for mistrial. | 5 | 6 |
Dresser v. Stategreen2 sentences2014See Dresser v. State, 454 N.E.2d 406, 407-08 (Ind. 1983). [A] failure to request an admonishment or move for a mistrial results in waiver of the issue. 2014See Dresser v. State, 454 N.E.2d 406, 407-08 (Ind. 1983). [A] failure to request an admonishment or move for a mistrial results in waiver of the issue. | 5 | 5 |
Etienne v. Stategreen2 sentences2015A “failure to request an admonishment or move for a mistrial results in waiver of the issue.” Id. (emphasis added). 2010"Failure to request an admonishment or move for a mistrial results in waiver of the issue." Etienne v. State, 716 N.E.2d 457, 461 (Ind.1999). | 3 | 6 |
Cooper v. Stategreen2 sentences2019See Knapp v. State, 9 N.E.3d 1274, 1281 (Ind. 2014); Cooper, 854 N.E.2d at 836 . 2012See Cooper v. State, 854 N.E.2d 831, 835 (Ind. 2006) (when an improper argument is alleged to have been made, “[f]ailure to request an admonishment or to move for a mistrial results in waiver”). | 1 | 2 |
Evans v. Stategreen1 sentence2025Failure to request an admonishment or move for a mistrial results in waiver of the issue of improper argument.”); Evans v. State, 855 N.E.2d 378, 384 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006) (“Even assuming that the issue was properly framed in terms of prosecutorial misconduct, Evans failed to request an admonishment or move for mistrial. | 1 | 1 |
Wright v. Stategreen1 sentence2024See Wright v. State, 690 N.E.2d 1098, 1111 (Ind. 1997) (“Failure to request an admonishment or move for a mistrial results in waiver of the issue. | 1 | 1 |
Flowers v. Stategreen1 sentence2024Generally this is so, even if the court has overruled a timely objection.” (citations omitted)); see also Flowers v. State, 738 N.E.2d 1051, 1058-59 (Ind. 2000) (“To preserve an issue regarding the propriety of a closing argument for appeal, a defendant must do more than simply make a prompt objection to the argument. | 1 | 1 |
Engelica E. Castillo v. State of Indianagreen1 sentence2019Id.; see also Castillo v. State, 974 N.E.2d 458, 468 (Ind. 2012) (noting that a defendant must request a mistrial if he considers the trial court’s admonishment to be inadequate and the failure to move for a mistrial results in waiver). [18] Here, Thomas objected at trial to only one of the statements by the prosecuting attorney that he now claims were improper. | 1 | 1 |
Randy L. Knapp v. State of Indianagreen1 sentence2019See Knapp v. State, 9 N.E.3d 1274, 1281 (Ind. 2014); Cooper, 854 N.E.2d at 836 . | 1 | 1 |
John Cherry v. State of Indianagreen1 sentence2019Cherry v. State, 971 N.E.2d 726, 733 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012) (citations omitted), trans. denied. | 1 | 1 |
Brewer v. Stategreen2 sentences1993Brewer v. State (1993), Ind., 605 N.E.2d 181, 182 (citations omitted); see also Dresser v. State (1983), Ind., 454 N.E.2d 406, 407 . 1993Brewer v. State (1993), Ind., 605 N.E.2d 181, 182 (citations omitted); see also Dresser v. State (1983), Ind., 454 N.E.2d 406, 407 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Isaacs v. State
green
2 sentences2001Id. 2001Id. | 5 | 1997–2001 |
Nunley v. State
green
2 sentences2013Id. 2012Id. | 3 | 2012–2013 |
Brown v. State
green
2 sentences2001Although the language in both is "the failure to request an admonishment or move for a mistrial results in waiver of the issue," Robinson, 698 N.E.2d at 552; Brown, 572 N.E.2d at 498 , in both cases, the defendants not only failed to seek an admonishment but also failed to move for mistrial. 2001Although the language in both is "the failure to request an admonishment or move for a mistrial results in waiver of the issue," Robinson, 693 N.E.2d at 552 ; Brown, 572 N.E.2d at 498 , in both cases, the defendants not only failed to seek an admonishment but also failed to move for mistrial. | 3 | 1993–2001 |
Ryan Shelby v. State of Indiana
green
2 sentences2016Id. 2014Id. | 2 | 2014–2016 |
Hand v. State
green
2 sentences2013Id. 2013Id. | 2 | 2013–2013 |
Zenthofer v. State
green
2 sentences1997Zenthofer v. State, 613 N.E.2d at 34 . 1996Id. | 2 | 1996–1997 |
Mitchell v. United States
green
2 sentences2020A “failure to request an admonishment or move for a mistrial results in waiver of the issue.” Id. (emphasis in original). 2020In essence “waiver occurs where there was neither a request for admonishment nor a motion for mistrial.” Id. (emphasis in original). [41] In the present case, during the hearing about the January incident, the trial court excluded any mention of Wilderness placing a gun to anyone’s head. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Kevin Charles Isom v. State of Indiana
green
2 sentences2020A “failure to request an admonishment or move for a mistrial results in waiver of the issue.” Id. (emphasis in original). 2020In essence “waiver occurs where there was neither a request for admonishment nor a motion for mistrial.” Id. (emphasis in original). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Reid v. State
green
1 sentence2003Id. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Brewer v. State
green
1 sentence1991Brewer v. State (1983), Ind., 455 N.E.2d 324 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.