Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
D'ALESSANDRO v. Pennsylvania State Policegreen2 sentences2017On May 6, 2016, the AU issued an order denying the request for an expedited response, but suspending the briefing schedule, 4 . 'Typically, questions concerning the admission or exclusion of evidence in an administrative proceeding are within the discretion of the tribunal conducting the hearing and are not to be disturbed on appeal absent a finding of abuse of discretion.’ D‘Alessandro v. Pa. State Police, 594 Pa. 500 , 937 A.2d 404, 409 (2007) (citation omitted).... 2017On May 6, 2016, the AU issued an order denying the request for an expedited response, but suspending the briefing schedule, 4 . 'Typically, questions concerning the admission or exclusion of evidence in an administrative proceeding are within the discretion of the tribunal conducting the hearing and are not to be disturbed on appeal absent a finding of abuse of discretion.’ D‘Alessandro v. Pa. State Police, 594 Pa. 500 , 937 A.2d 404, 409 (2007) (citation omitted).... | 3 | 3 |
Gibson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Boardgreen2 sentences2007Gibson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Armco Stainless & Alloy Products), 580 Pa. 470 , 861 A.2d 938, 947 (2004). 2007Gibson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Armco Stainless & Alloy Products), 580 Pa. 470 , 861 A.2d 938, 947 (2004). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
R.J.W. v. Department of Human Services
green
1 sentence2020In addition, “[t]ypically, questions concerning the admission or exclusion of evidence in an administrative proceeding are within the discretion of the tribunal conducting the hearing and are not to be disturbed on appeal absent a finding of abuse of discretion.” Id. | 1 | 2020–2020 |