Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 South Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1996–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Matter of Adoption of Baby Boy Dgreen2 sentences1996“We do not consider whether the party filing the challenge “will ultimately be entitled to any relief but whether he has the legal right to seek judicial redress for his grievance.’ ” Id. (quoting In re Adoption of Baby Boy D., 742 P.2d 1059, 1062 (Okla.1985), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1072 , 108 S.Ct. 1042 , 98 L.Ed.2d 1005 (1988)). [¶ 23] D.G. has not challenged the appointment of Mother’s counsel as a taxpayer of Pennington County. 12 His sole challenge is that the appointment placed the parties on unequal footing because he was required to provide counsel at his expense while Mother enjoyed t 1996"We do not consider whether the party filing the challenge `will ultimately be entitled to any relief but whether he has the legal right to seek judicial redress for his grievance.'" Id. (quoting In re Adoption of Baby Boy D., 742 P.2d 1059, 1062 (Okla.1985), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1072 , 108 S.Ct. 1042 , 98 L.Ed.2d 1005 (1988)). [¶ 23] D.G. has not challenged the appointment of Mother's counsel as a taxpayer of Pennington County. [12] His sole challenge is that the appointment placed the parties on unequal footing because he was required to provide counsel at his expense while Mother enjoyed | 2 | 2 |
In Re the Termination of Parental Rights Over Boy K.green2 sentences2010Additionally, “[w]e do not consider whether the party filing the challenge ‘will ultimately be entitled to any relief but whether he has the legal right to seek judicial redress for his grievance.’ ” D.G., 1996 S.D. 144 , ¶ 22, 557 N.W.2d at 239 (quoting In re Baby Boy K., 1996 S.D. 33 , ¶ 14, 546 N.W.2d 86, 90 ). 2006I concur because, when standing is at issue in the early stages of litigation, “the focus is on the party seeking relief, not on the issues [presented, and] [w]e do not consider whether the party filing the challenge ‘will ultimately be entitled to any relief but whether he has the legal right to seek judicial redress for his grievance.’ ” Matter of Baby Boy K., 1996 SD 33, ¶ 14 , 546 N.W.2d 86, 90 (internal citations omitted). [¶ 28.] However, I disagree with the Court’s opinion to the extent it suggests that the causation element of standing was ultimately proven, ie., that Landowners’ “inju | 1 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Groff v. Township of Elizabeth
green
2 sentences1996“We do not consider whether the party filing the challenge “will ultimately be entitled to any relief but whether he has the legal right to seek judicial redress for his grievance.’ ” Id. (quoting In re Adoption of Baby Boy D., 742 P.2d 1059, 1062 (Okla.1985), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1072 , 108 S.Ct. 1042 , 98 L.Ed.2d 1005 (1988)). [¶ 23] D.G. has not challenged the appointment of Mother’s counsel as a taxpayer of Pennington County. 12 His sole challenge is that the appointment placed the parties on unequal footing because he was required to provide counsel at his expense while Mother enjoyed t 1996We do not consider whether the party filing the challenge “will ultimately be entitled to any relief but whether he has the legal right to seek judicial redress for his grievance.” Id. [¶ 15] In his motion to vacate, W.B.L. alleged that he is the natural father of Child. | 3 | 1996–1996 |
Embrey v. United States
green
2 sentences1996“We do not consider whether the party filing the challenge “will ultimately be entitled to any relief but whether he has the legal right to seek judicial redress for his grievance.’ ” Id. (quoting In re Adoption of Baby Boy D., 742 P.2d 1059, 1062 (Okla.1985), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1072 , 108 S.Ct. 1042 , 98 L.Ed.2d 1005 (1988)). [¶ 23] D.G. has not challenged the appointment of Mother’s counsel as a taxpayer of Pennington County. 12 His sole challenge is that the appointment placed the parties on unequal footing because he was required to provide counsel at his expense while Mother enjoyed t 1996"We do not consider whether the party filing the challenge `will ultimately be entitled to any relief but whether he has the legal right to seek judicial redress for his grievance.'" Id. (quoting In re Adoption of Baby Boy D., 742 P.2d 1059, 1062 (Okla.1985), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1072 , 108 S.Ct. 1042 , 98 L.Ed.2d 1005 (1988)). [¶ 23] D.G. has not challenged the appointment of Mother's counsel as a taxpayer of Pennington County. [12] His sole challenge is that the appointment placed the parties on unequal footing because he was required to provide counsel at his expense while Mother enjoyed | 2 | 1996–1996 |
Smith v. Lynaugh
green
2 sentences1996“We do not consider whether the party filing the challenge “will ultimately be entitled to any relief but whether he has the legal right to seek judicial redress for his grievance.’ ” Id. (quoting In re Adoption of Baby Boy D., 742 P.2d 1059, 1062 (Okla.1985), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1072 , 108 S.Ct. 1042 , 98 L.Ed.2d 1005 (1988)). [¶ 23] D.G. has not challenged the appointment of Mother’s counsel as a taxpayer of Pennington County. 12 His sole challenge is that the appointment placed the parties on unequal footing because he was required to provide counsel at his expense while Mother enjoyed t 1996"We do not consider whether the party filing the challenge `will ultimately be entitled to any relief but whether he has the legal right to seek judicial redress for his grievance.'" Id. (quoting In re Adoption of Baby Boy D., 742 P.2d 1059, 1062 (Okla.1985), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1072 , 108 S.Ct. 1042 , 98 L.Ed.2d 1005 (1988)). [¶ 23] D.G. has not challenged the appointment of Mother's counsel as a taxpayer of Pennington County. [12] His sole challenge is that the appointment placed the parties on unequal footing because he was required to provide counsel at his expense while Mother enjoyed | 2 | 1996–1996 |
LEWIS & CLARK RURAL WATER SYSTEM v. Seeba
green
1 sentence2010In examining South Dakota statutes and case law, it is apparent that a declaratory judgment action is not precluded even when there may be jurisdiction in another action. [¶ 28.] Finnemans compare this case to Lewis & Clark Rural Water System, Inc. v. Seeba, 2006 S.D. 7 , 709 N.W.2d 824 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.