Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1985–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Robinson v. Robinsongreen1 sentence2020“The party filing an exception of lis pendens has the burden of proving the facts necessary for his exception to be sustained.” Robinson v. Robinson, 474 So.2d 46, 48 (La. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Home Distrib. v. Dollar Amusement
green
2 sentences2010Home Distribution, Inc. v. Dollar Amusement, Inc., 98-1692 (La.App. 1st Cir.9/24/99), 754 So.2d 1057, 1060 . 2008Home Distribution, Inc. v. Dollar Amusement, Inc., 98-1692 (La.App. 1st Cir.9/24/99), 754 So.2d 1057, 1060 . | 4 | 2005–2010 |
Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
green
2 sentences2009Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, 2004-1296 (La.App. 1st Cir.9/23/05), 921 So.2d 972, 975 , writ denied, 2005-2501 (La.4/17/06), 926 So.2d 514 . |i2No evidence may be introduced to support or controvert the objection that the petition fails to state a cause of action. 2008Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 04-1296 (La.App. 1st Cir.9/23/05), 921 So.2d 972, 975 , writ denied, 05-2501 (La.4/17/06), 926 So.2d 514 . | 2 | 2008–2009 |
Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation
green
2 sentences2009Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, 2004-1296 (La.App. 1st Cir.9/23/05), 921 So.2d 972, 975 , writ denied, 2005-2501 (La.4/17/06), 926 So.2d 514 . |i2No evidence may be introduced to support or controvert the objection that the petition fails to state a cause of action. 2008Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 04-1296 (La.App. 1st Cir.9/23/05), 921 So.2d 972, 975 , writ denied, 05-2501 (La.4/17/06), 926 So.2d 514 . | 2 | 2008–2009 |
Ramey v. DeCaire
green
1 sentence2025Ramey, 03-1299, p. 7, 869 So.2d at 119 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Zen-Noh Grain Corp. v. Thompson
green
1 sentence2024App. 5 Cir. 08/27/13), 123 So.3d 777, 780 ; Bufkin, supra. The party filing the exception of lis pendens has the burden of proving the facts necessary for the exception to be sustained. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Watson v. Woldenberg Village, Inc.
green
1 sentence2020Watson, 16- 0159, p. 4, 203 So.3d at 321 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Town of Grand Isle v. Dynamic Constructors, Inc.
green
1 sentence1985Cf. Morris v. Rental Tools, Inc., 435 So.2d 528 (La.App. 5th Cir.1983); Town of Grand Isle v. Dynamic Constructors, 374 So.2d 703 (La.App. 1st Cir.1979). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Morris v. Rental Tools, Inc.
green
1 sentence1985Cf. Morris v. Rental Tools, Inc., 435 So.2d 528 (La.App. 5th Cir.1983); Town of Grand Isle v. Dynamic Constructors, 374 So.2d 703 (La.App. 1st Cir.1979). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.