Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ellisongreen2 sentences2013See State v. Ellison, 841 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tenn. 1992). 2012See also State v. Ellison, 841 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tenn.1992). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Livingstongreen1 sentence2011As noted by the petitioner, in State v. Livingston, 907 S.W.2d 392, 394 (Tenn. 1995), the court eliminated the doctrine of fresh complaint when a child is the victim of sexual abuse. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Powers v. Ohio
green
2 sentences2013In Powers v. Ohio, 499 U.S. 400 (1991), the Court eliminated the requirement that the defendant and any wrongfully excluded juror(s) be of the same race. 2012Five years later, in Powers v. Ohio, 499 U.S. 400, 409 , 111 S.Ct. 1364 , 113 L.Ed.2d 411 (1991), the Court eliminated the requirement that any wrongfully excluded juror be of the same race as the defendant in order to merit protection under the rule. | 4 | 1994–2013 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.