Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Audrey S.green1 sentence2023As this Court has explained, “Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-1- 113(k) ‘explicitly requires courts terminating parental rights to enter an order which makes specific findings of fact and conclusions of law whether they have been requested to do so or not.’” In re Maria B.S., No. E2011-01784-COA-R3-PT, 2012 WL 1431244 , at *2 (Tenn. Ct. App. Apr. 25, 2012) (quoting In re Audrey S., 182 S.W.3d 838, 861 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005)). | 1 | 1 |
Eaton v. McLaingreen1 sentence2004Id. at 592 (footnotes omitted). | 1 | 1 |
FOREST PRODUCTS, DIV. OF LUDLOW CORP v. Collinsgreen2 sentences1988“In determining the amount of disability suffered by an injured employee, the trial court considers all the evidence and is not restricted to the precise estimate of disability made by a medical witness.” Forest Products v. Collins, 534 S.W.2d 306, 309 (Tenn.1976) (citations omitted). 1988"In determining the amount of disability suffered by an injured employee, the trial court considers all the evidence and is not restricted to the precise estimate of disability made by a medical witness." Forest Products v. Collins, 534 S.W.2d 306, 309 (Tenn. 1976) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hodges v. S.C. Toof & Co.
green
1 sentence2009Hodges, 833 S.W.2d at 901-02 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Ramsey v. Beavers
green
2 sentences2004In discussing these elements in Ramsey , we clarified that a negligent infliction of emotional distress claim premised upon witnessing the death or injury of a third person requires a plaintiff to show that a “third person’s death or injury and plaintiffs emotional injury were proximate and foreseeable results of defendant’s negli gence.” 931 S.W.2d at 531 . 2 We commented that foreseeability required consideration of a number of relevant factors but that only two of them were essential: (1) the plaintiffs physical location showed “sufficient proximity to the injury-producing event to allow se 2004In discussing these elements in Ramsey , we clarified that a negligent infliction of emotional distress claim premised upon witnessing the death or injury of a third person requires a plaintiff to show that a “third person’s death or injury and plaintiffs emotional injury were proximate and foreseeable results of defendant’s negli gence.” 931 S.W.2d at 531 . 2 We commented that foreseeability required consideration of a number of relevant factors but that only two of them were essential: (1) the plaintiffs physical location showed “sufficient proximity to the injury-producing event to allow se | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.