Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cyrus Deville Wilson v. State of Tennesseegreen2 sentences2016See Wilson, 367 S.W.3d at 234 . 2013Id. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. David Willard Phipps, Jr.
green
1 sentence2017Id. at 547 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. White
green
1 sentence2010As in Walsh , where the defendant failed to raise the issue of improper influence on the jury during his direct appeals, the State in this case “has denied the petitioner an opportunity to rebut the presumption that this issue has been waived.” Id. at 645 (citing Tenn.Code Ann. § 40 — 30—110(f) (2003) (providing that “[tjhere is a rebuttable presumption that a ground for relief not raised before a court of competent jurisdiction in which the ground could have been presented is waived”)). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Walsh v. State
green
1 sentence2006Id. (citing T.C.A. § 40- 30-110(f)(2003)). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.